Examiner Alan Luong

Grant ratio: 43.5% (16th percentile in Art Unit 2425 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.42. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2020
Grant ratio 43.5%
Average office actions / grant 3.42
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84164
Primary art unit
2425
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
333
Granted applications
145

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 54.3% 2.69
Group 130 52.7% 2.61
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.39 1,210 office actions across 357 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 357 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 79 22.1%
2 OAs 99 27.7%
3 OAs 48 13.4%
4 OAs 36 10.1%
5+ OAs 95 26.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 14.8% 2008 2009: 34.6% 2009 2010: 33.3% 2010 2011: 45.5% 2011 2012: 40.0% 2012 2013: 44.2% 2013 2014: 43.8% 2014 2015: 40.9% 2015 2016: 53.8% 2016 2017: 41.9% 2017 2018: 42.9% 2018 2019: 64.3% 2019 2020: 68.4% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
200827414.8%
200926934.6%
201015533.3%
2011221045.5%
201220840.0%
2013431944.2%
2014321443.8%
201522940.9%
2016261453.8%
2017311341.9%
201821942.9%
2019281864.3%
2020191368.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 357 0.6% 5.0% 92.2% 0.3%
Action 2 278 1.4% 3.6% 93.2% 0.4%
Action 3 179 0.0% 3.4% 95.0% 1.1%
Action 4 131 1.5% 1.5% 94.7% 1.5%
Action 5 95 2.1% 2.1% 95.8% 0.0%
Action 6 71 0.0% 1.4% 97.2% 1.4%
Action 7 42 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 24 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.8% 10 of 1,210 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2.4%
1.8%
0.9%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.1%
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 11 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 5 reversed.

Full reversal rate
29.4% 5/17 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
35.3% 6/17 decisions
Median appeal duration
27.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 19, 2020 15/315,392 Affirmed §103
Nov. 21, 2018 14/606,072 Reversed §112
Sep. 26, 2018 12/337,445 Affirmed §103
Sep. 16, 2016 13/216,457 Affirmed §103
Aug. 19, 2016 11/871,306 Affirmed §103
Dec. 18, 2015 12/112,524 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 20, 2015 12/111,298 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 23, 2014 10/940,077 Reversed N/A
Mar. 3, 2014 10/939,114 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 12, 2012 10/672,654 Reversed §103
Dec. 6, 2012 11/226,693 Affirmed §103
Oct. 26, 2012 10/839,884 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.