Examiner Susan E Hodges

Grant ratio: 55.7% (50th percentile in Art Unit 2425 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.22. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 55.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.22
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91883
Primary art unit
2425
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
429
Granted applications
239
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0498

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 53.2% 2.71
Group 129 52.2% 2.61
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 1,006 office actions across 429 applications
Applications with office actions 98.6% 423 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 1.4%
1 OA 161 37.5%
2 OAs 114 26.6%
3 OAs 58 13.5%
4 OAs 43 10.0%
5+ OAs 47 11.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 5.9% 2015 2016: 25.0% 2016 2017: 36.7% 2017 2018: 51.3% 2018 2019: 63.2% 2019 2020: 82.9% 2020 2021: 88.2% 2021 2022: 100.0% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 83.3% 2024 2025: 56.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20151715.9%
201632825.0%
2017301136.7%
2018392051.3%
2019573663.2%
2020413482.9%
2021343088.2%
20222828100.0%
2023242187.5%
2024302583.3%
2025442556.8%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 423 1.4% 16.8% 80.1% 0.2%
Action 2 262 0.8% 10.3% 88.9% 0.0%
Action 3 148 0.7% 5.4% 91.2% 0.0%
Action 4 90 0.0% 4.4% 93.3% 1.1%
Action 5 47 0.0% 6.4% 89.4% 2.1%
Action 6 22 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.7% 4 of 241 office actions
All years 0.9% 9 of 1,006 office actions
Change +0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
1.3%
1.8%
0.9%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
2024: AI examples
1.4%
2025: August memo
1.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 0 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 6/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
100.0% 9/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 4, 2022 15/500,463 Reversed §103
Oct. 21, 2021 15/264,366 Reversed §102 · §103
May. 3, 2021 13/828,562 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Dec. 28, 2020 13/463,837 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §112
Aug. 28, 2020 13/827,460 Reversed §103
Apr. 2, 2020 14/765,200 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 3, 2020 14/571,477 Reversed §101 · §102 · §112
Jun. 26, 2019 14/379,593 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jun. 1, 2017 13/823,637 Reversed §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.