Examiner Jun Fei Zhong

Grant ratio: 35.0% (17th percentile in Art Unit 2426 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.82. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2016
Grant ratio 35.0%
Average office actions / grant 3.82
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83279
Primary art unit
2426
Work group
2420
Technology center
2400
Applications
234
Granted applications
82

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 50.0% 2.88
Group 130 52.7% 2.61
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.54 829 office actions across 234 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 234 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 51 21.8%
2 OAs 45 19.2%
3 OAs 39 16.7%
4 OAs 30 12.8%
5+ OAs 69 29.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 16.7% 2008 2009: 13.0% 2009 2010: 15.0% 2010 2011: 46.7% 2011 2012: 25.0% 2012 2013: 45.7% 2013 2014: 46.5% 2014 2015: 45.0% 2015 2016: 71.4% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200824416.7%
200923313.0%
201020315.0%
2011301446.7%
201232825.0%
2013351645.7%
2014432046.5%
201520945.0%
20167571.4%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 234 0.0% 15.4% 83.3% 0.4%
Action 2 183 2.2% 11.5% 79.2% 2.2%
Action 3 138 1.4% 9.4% 86.2% 0.7%
Action 4 99 1.0% 8.1% 85.9% 0.0%
Action 5 69 0.0% 7.2% 82.6% 2.9%
Action 6 43 2.3% 7.0% 81.4% 7.0%
Action 7 25 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 4.0%
Action 8 18 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 0.0%
Action 9 10 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 10.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 1.0% 8 of 829 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
1.6%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.3%
14.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
46.7% 7/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
53.3% 8/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 22, 2016 12/203,760 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103
Dec. 17, 2015 12/373,271 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 21, 2015 12/449,289 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 11, 2015 12/259,411 Reversed N/A
Aug. 25, 2015 12/029,417 Reversed N/A
Jun. 26, 2015 10/420,131 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 27, 2015 10/286,797 Reversed N/A
Mar. 9, 2015 12/190,076 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 30, 2015 12/059,609 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 15, 2014 12/757,755 Reversed N/A
Aug. 27, 2014 12/190,024 Reversed N/A
Jul. 14, 2014 11/082,591 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.