Examiner Vadim Savenkov

Grant ratio: 49.6% (17th percentile in Art Unit 2431 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 49.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.69
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89673
Primary art unit
2431
Work group
2430
Technology center
2400
Applications
373
Granted applications
185
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5751
Supervisor
Jeffrey L Nickerson
Supervisor phone
(469) 295-9235

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 63.4% 2.09
Group 233 61.7% 1.99
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.39 1,263 office actions across 373 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 372 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.3%
1 OA 83 22.3%
2 OAs 94 25.2%
3 OAs 56 15.0%
4 OAs 47 12.6%
5+ OAs 92 24.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 62.5% 2013 2014: 65.5% 2014 2015: 82.6% 2015 2016: 84.4% 2016 2017: 76.5% 2017 2018: 91.7% 2018 2019: 65.5% 2019 2020: 36.8% 2020 2021: 50.0% 2021 2022: 15.4% 2022 2023: 18.8% 2023 2024: 19.0% 2024 2025: 14.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2013161062.5%
2014291965.5%
2015231982.6%
2016322784.4%
2017342676.5%
2018363391.7%
2019291965.5%
202019736.8%
2021241250.0%
202213215.4%
202316318.8%
202421419.0%
202528414.3%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 372 0.8% 3.8% 91.4% 1.6%
Action 2 289 0.3% 2.8% 94.1% 2.1%
Action 3 195 0.0% 2.1% 95.9% 1.0%
Action 4 139 0.7% 0.7% 93.5% 2.9%
Action 5 92 0.0% 3.3% 94.6% 2.2%
Action 6 66 3.0% 1.5% 93.9% 1.5%
Action 7 42 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 29 3.4% 0.0% 96.6% 0.0%
Action 9 17 5.9% 0.0% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 10 13 7.7% 0.0% 92.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.0% 3 of 307 office actions
All years 0.8% 10 of 1,263 office actions
Change +0.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.6%
2.4%
1.2%
1.3%
2019: PEG
1.2%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.0%
1.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
42.9% 3/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 31, 2023 15/596,042 Affirmed §103
Aug. 26, 2021 14/988,472 Affirmed §103
Feb. 16, 2021 14/674,225 Reversed §103
Sep. 4, 2019 14/673,969 Affirmed §103
Feb. 27, 2017 13/491,876 Affirmed in part §101 · §103
Apr. 26, 2016 13/072,884 Reversed §103
Feb. 26, 2016 13/080,884 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.