Examiner Amie C Lin

Grant ratio: 75.3% (54th percentile in Art Unit 2436 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.01. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 75.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.01
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91439
Primary art unit
2436
Work group
2430
Technology center
2400
Applications
316
Granted applications
238
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7752
Supervisor
Gelagay Shewaye
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4219

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 27 61.4% 2.11
Group 233 61.7% 1.99
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.98 626 office actions across 316 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 316 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 156 49.4%
2 OAs 86 27.2%
3 OAs 36 11.4%
4 OAs 17 5.4%
5+ OAs 21 6.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 60.0% 2015 2016: 76.2% 2016 2017: 77.3% 2017 2018: 97.0% 2018 2019: 69.6% 2019 2020: 86.2% 2020 2021: 94.6% 2021 2022: 94.1% 2022 2023: 90.0% 2023 2024: 79.4% 2024 2025: 38.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201433100.0%
2015201260.0%
2016211676.2%
2017221777.3%
2018333297.0%
2019231669.6%
2020292586.2%
2021373594.6%
2022171694.1%
2023302790.0%
2024342779.4%
2025311238.7%
20261600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 316 0.0% 10.1% 89.6% 0.0%
Action 2 160 0.0% 6.3% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 3 74 0.0% 4.1% 95.9% 0.0%
Action 4 38 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 21 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 114 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 626 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 1, 2022 15/194,423 Reversed §103
May. 27, 2022 15/617,136 Reversed §103
Mar. 30, 2022 15/275,203 Affirmed §103
Oct. 26, 2020 14/242,931 Reversed §103
Aug. 23, 2018 13/863,154 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 3, 2017 13/969,154 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.