Examiner Benjamin M. Thieu

Grant ratio: 78.1% (76th percentile in Art Unit 2441 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.84
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86026
Primary art unit
2441
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
636
Granted applications
497
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7475
Supervisor
Wing Chan
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7493

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 70.5% 2.09
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.83 1,162 office actions across 636 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 636 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 359 56.4%
2 OAs 150 23.6%
3 OAs 64 10.1%
4 OAs 32 5.0%
5+ OAs 31 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 53.3% 2009 2010: 67.7% 2010 2011: 66.7% 2011 2012: 75.7% 2012 2013: 80.0% 2013 2014: 82.8% 2014 2015: 88.2% 2015 2016: 88.1% 2016 2017: 81.8% 2017 2018: 75.6% 2018 2019: 89.7% 2019 2020: 92.1% 2020 2021: 96.4% 2021 2022: 94.1% 2022 2023: 92.5% 2023 2024: 97.6% 2024 2025: 55.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009301653.3%
2010312167.7%
2011302066.7%
2012372875.7%
2013302480.0%
2014292482.8%
2015343088.2%
2016423788.1%
2017443681.8%
2018453475.6%
2019393589.7%
2020383592.1%
2021282796.4%
2022343294.1%
2023403792.5%
2024424197.6%
2025362055.6%
20262700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 636 0.8% 28.3% 54.9% 0.6%
Action 2 277 14.1% 7.9% 60.3% 13.0%
Action 3 127 7.9% 1.6% 81.9% 7.9%
Action 4 63 15.9% 1.6% 73.0% 4.8%
Action 5 31 3.2% 0.0% 90.3% 6.5%
Action 6 15 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 1 of 140 office actions
All years 5.6% 65 of 1,162 office actions
Change -4.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
5.4%
12.9%
8.0%
8.5%
4.3%
2014: Alice
6.6%
4.2%
12.7%
6.5%
11.7%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 1/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
12.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 18, 2022 15/355,371 Affirmed §103
Sep. 18, 2018 13/675,654 Affirmed §103
Jul. 16, 2018 14/388,984 Reversed §102
Jun. 18, 2015 12/303,451 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.