Examiner Angela Nguyen

Grant ratio: 68.7% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2442 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.21. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 68.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.21
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85254
Primary art unit
2442
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
517
Granted applications
355
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5660
Supervisor
Brian Gillis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7952

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 40.5% 2.35
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.17 1,124 office actions across 517 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 516 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 240 46.4%
2 OAs 122 23.6%
3 OAs 64 12.4%
4 OAs 46 8.9%
5+ OAs 44 8.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 8.7% 2009 2010: 61.9% 2010 2011: 48.0% 2011 2012: 46.9% 2012 2013: 45.5% 2013 2014: 77.3% 2014 2015: 75.8% 2015 2016: 81.0% 2016 2017: 76.7% 2017 2018: 83.3% 2018 2019: 82.9% 2019 2020: 87.5% 2020 2021: 94.7% 2021 2022: 93.3% 2022 2023: 94.7% 2023 2024: 97.0% 2024 2025: 52.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008600.0%
20092328.7%
2010211361.9%
2011251248.0%
2012321546.9%
2013221045.5%
2014443477.3%
2015332575.8%
2016423481.0%
2017433376.7%
2018363083.3%
2019413482.9%
2020242187.5%
2021191894.7%
2022151493.3%
2023191894.7%
2024333297.0%
2025191052.6%
20262000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 516 3.1% 13.8% 70.0% 1.0%
Action 2 276 1.8% 8.3% 84.1% 2.2%
Action 3 154 0.6% 7.1% 86.4% 2.6%
Action 4 90 0.0% 5.6% 91.1% 2.2%
Action 5 44 0.0% 9.1% 88.6% 2.3%
Action 6 30 0.0% 13.3% 70.0% 16.7%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.4% 2 of 84 office actions
All years 2.0% 22 of 1,124 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
3.9%
3.4%
2019: PEG
1.1%
4.9%
20.0%
0.0%
3.8%
2024: AI examples
2.9%
2025: August memo
0.0%
4.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 22, 2018 12/705,508 Affirmed §102 · §103
Nov. 2, 2017 12/217,820 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 26, 2016 12/685,471 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jun. 9, 2016 11/866,989 Affirmed §103
Jun. 9, 2016 11/306,612 Affirmed §103
Aug. 18, 2014 11/418,134 Reversed N/A
Apr. 28, 2014 11/116,032 Reversed §103
Mar. 26, 2013 11/158,777 Affirmed §102
Feb. 28, 2013 11/111,028 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.