Examiner Alina N. Boutah

Grant ratio: 84.6% (98th percentile in Art Unit 2443 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.63. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 84.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.63
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
79412
Primary art unit
2443
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
864
Granted applications
731
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3908
Supervisor
Umar Cheema
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3037

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 55.7% 2.65
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.63 1,407 office actions across 864 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 861 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 3 0.3%
1 OA 542 62.7%
2 OAs 189 21.9%
3 OAs 76 8.8%
4 OAs 28 3.2%
5+ OAs 26 3.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 78.9% 2008 2009: 88.5% 2009 2010: 90.9% 2010 2011: 87.3% 2011 2012: 84.0% 2012 2013: 88.2% 2013 2014: 86.4% 2014 2015: 91.9% 2015 2016: 87.8% 2016 2017: 89.8% 2017 2018: 89.6% 2018 2019: 91.7% 2019 2020: 97.3% 2020 2021: 90.6% 2021 2022: 93.0% 2022 2023: 97.9% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024 2025: 56.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008383078.9%
2009524688.5%
2010555090.9%
2011554887.3%
2012504284.0%
2013514588.2%
2014595186.4%
2015373491.9%
2016494387.8%
2017494489.8%
2018484389.6%
2019484491.7%
2020373697.3%
2021322990.6%
2022434093.0%
2023484797.9%
20244242100.0%
2025301756.7%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 861 4.6% 17.0% 63.9% 5.2%
Action 2 319 10.0% 16.0% 60.8% 4.4%
Action 3 130 4.6% 10.8% 73.8% 5.4%
Action 4 54 7.4% 5.6% 70.4% 7.4%
Action 5 26 7.7% 7.7% 76.9% 7.7%
Action 6 15 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 13.3%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 5.0% 8 of 161 office actions
All years 6.0% 84 of 1,407 office actions
Change -1.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

4.3%
3.6%
5.3%
7.1%
4.9%
5.6%
2014: Alice
2.4%
10.5%
14.7%
11.7%
18.8%
2019: PEG
5.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.9%
2024: AI examples
7.7%
2025: August memo
5.0%
2.2%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
62.5% 5/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 25, 2024 17/825,900 Reversed §103
Aug. 1, 2019 14/729,705 Affirmed §101
Mar. 24, 2016 12/261,640 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 23, 2015 12/359,048 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 25, 2014 10/864,032 Reversed N/A
Feb. 5, 2014 12/135,946 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112
Dec. 31, 2013 11/482,217 Reversed §103
Jul. 20, 2012 10/454,190 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.