Examiner Daniel C. Murray

Grant ratio: 51.4% (26th percentile in Art Unit 2443 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.46. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: July 2020
Grant ratio 51.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.46
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83256
Primary art unit
2443
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
311
Granted applications
160

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 55.7% 2.65
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.72 860 office actions across 316 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 316 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 110 34.8%
2 OAs 76 24.1%
3 OAs 36 11.4%
4 OAs 45 14.2%
5+ OAs 49 15.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 35.0% 2009 2010: 15.0% 2010 2011: 37.0% 2011 2012: 47.4% 2012 2013: 51.5% 2013 2014: 45.9% 2014 2015: 68.4% 2015 2016: 31.3% 2016 2017: 66.7% 2017 2018: 75.0% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 76.5% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20081200.0%
200920735.0%
201020315.0%
2011271037.0%
201219947.4%
2013331751.5%
2014371745.9%
2015382668.4%
201616531.3%
201712866.7%
2018201575.0%
2019403075.0%
2020171376.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 316 2.5% 12.0% 77.8% 5.7%
Action 2 206 16.0% 9.2% 68.4% 4.4%
Action 3 130 10.0% 6.9% 77.7% 4.6%
Action 4 94 11.7% 5.3% 74.5% 7.4%
Action 5 49 8.2% 4.1% 85.7% 2.0%
Action 6 30 10.0% 10.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 7 17 5.9% 11.8% 76.5% 5.9%
Action 8 9 0.0% 11.1% 77.8% 11.1%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 8.6% 74 of 860 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

3.1%
1.2%
2.8%
4.9%
5.9%
2.1%
2014: Alice
1.3%
18.6%
25.0%
13.8%
40.0%
2019: PEG
21.1%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 15. Merits outcomes: 8 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
46.7% 7/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
46.7% 7/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.6 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 24, 2021 15/487,776 Reversed §103
Nov. 23, 2021 15/487,808 Affirmed §103
Jan. 15, 2019 13/319,769 Affirmed §103
Dec. 28, 2017 11/755,611 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 31, 2017 12/440,893 Reversed New ground of rejection §102 · §112
Dec. 19, 2016 12/736,227 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 19, 2016 13/177,791 Reversed §103
Sep. 26, 2016 12/777,713 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103
Aug. 19, 2016 12/910,535 Reversed §103
Aug. 1, 2016 10/662,724 Affirmed §103
Oct. 14, 2015 11/926,394 Reversed N/A
Sep. 22, 2014 12/350,138 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.