Examiner Chong G Kim

Grant ratio: 70.0% (69th percentile in Art Unit 2443 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.35. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.35
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92043
Primary art unit
2443
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
476
Granted applications
333
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0619
Supervisor
Nicholas R. Taylor
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3889

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 55.7% 2.65
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.29 1,090 office actions across 476 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 476 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 153 32.1%
2 OAs 168 35.3%
3 OAs 78 16.4%
4 OAs 37 7.8%
5+ OAs 40 8.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 47.8% 2015 2016: 75.0% 2016 2017: 93.3% 2017 2018: 79.1% 2018 2019: 86.5% 2019 2020: 85.7% 2020 2021: 88.5% 2021 2022: 84.4% 2022 2023: 85.3% 2023 2024: 89.5% 2024 2025: 48.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014100.0%
2015231147.8%
2016403075.0%
2017302893.3%
2018433479.1%
2019373286.5%
2020423685.7%
2021262388.5%
2022453884.4%
2023342985.3%
2024575189.5%
2025432148.8%
20265500.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 476 1.3% 58.8% 37.4% 0.4%
Action 2 323 1.9% 34.4% 60.1% 0.9%
Action 3 155 0.6% 23.2% 72.9% 0.6%
Action 4 77 0.0% 15.6% 84.4% 0.0%
Action 5 40 2.5% 7.5% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 6 13 0.0% 15.4% 84.6% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 2 of 308 office actions
All years 1.3% 14 of 1,090 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
4.9%
2019: PEG
1.5%
1.2%
1.3%
1.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.9%
2025: August memo
1.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 10, 2024 16/460,371 Reversed §102
Dec. 15, 2020 14/267,181 Affirmed in part §102
Jun. 27, 2019 14/643,402 Affirmed §101 · §102
Mar. 8, 2017 13/760,287 Reversed §102

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.