Examiner Meng Vang

Grant ratio: 64.1% (60th percentile in Art Unit 2443 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.59. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 64.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.59
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92362
Primary art unit
2443
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
340
Granted applications
218
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7023
Supervisor
Nicholas Taylor
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3889

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 55.7% 2.65
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.46 837 office actions across 340 applications
Applications with office actions 98.5% 335 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 5 1.5%
1 OA 106 31.2%
2 OAs 102 30.0%
3 OAs 46 13.5%
4 OAs 41 12.1%
5+ OAs 40 11.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 57.1% 2016 2017: 44.4% 2017 2018: 78.6% 2018 2019: 82.8% 2019 2020: 82.1% 2020 2021: 70.6% 2021 2022: 80.0% 2022 2023: 82.9% 2023 2024: 96.4% 2024 2025: 37.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2015300.0%
20167457.1%
2017361644.4%
2018282278.6%
2019292482.8%
2020393282.1%
2021171270.6%
2022453680.0%
2023413482.9%
2024282796.4%
2025291137.9%
20263800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 335 0.6% 5.1% 92.5% 0.3%
Action 2 229 3.1% 1.7% 93.0% 1.7%
Action 3 127 2.4% 1.6% 95.3% 0.0%
Action 4 81 2.5% 0.0% 95.1% 0.0%
Action 5 40 2.5% 2.5% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 6 19 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.5% 7 of 154 office actions
All years 1.8% 15 of 837 office actions
Change +2.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
6.4%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
5.4%
2025: August memo
2.3%
9.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
37.5% 3/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
62.5% 5/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 20, 2022 15/661,789 Affirmed §103
May. 24, 2021 15/017,555 Reversed §103
Sep. 10, 2020 14/275,344 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jul. 1, 2020 14/482,197 Reversed §103 · §112
Jun. 4, 2020 14/482,245 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Jan. 24, 2020 14/356,926 Affirmed §101 · §103
Apr. 24, 2019 14/274,363 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 13, 2018 14/481,783 Reversed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.