Examiner Djenane Bayard

Grant ratio: 78.0% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 2444 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.27. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.27
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80070
Primary art unit
2444
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
823
Granted applications
642
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3878
Supervisor
John Follansbee
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3964

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 64.2% 2.35
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.21 1,817 office actions across 823 applications
Applications with office actions 99.0% 815 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 8 1.0%
1 OA 342 41.6%
2 OAs 239 29.0%
3 OAs 97 11.8%
4 OAs 64 7.8%
5+ OAs 73 8.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 61.1% 2008 2009: 61.1% 2009 2010: 78.7% 2010 2011: 96.2% 2011 2012: 75.5% 2012 2013: 79.6% 2013 2014: 90.2% 2014 2015: 84.4% 2015 2016: 78.4% 2016 2017: 68.4% 2017 2018: 88.9% 2018 2019: 90.2% 2019 2020: 94.7% 2020 2021: 92.6% 2021 2022: 95.6% 2022 2023: 87.5% 2023 2024: 84.0% 2024 2025: 41.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008362261.1%
2009362261.1%
2010473778.7%
2011525096.2%
2012493775.5%
2013493979.6%
2014413790.2%
2015453884.4%
2016372978.4%
2017382668.4%
2018363288.9%
2019514690.2%
2020383694.7%
2021545092.6%
2022454395.6%
2023484287.5%
2024504284.0%
2025341441.2%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 815 2.6% 22.6% 64.5% 1.2%
Action 2 473 1.9% 15.6% 74.4% 1.3%
Action 3 234 1.7% 6.0% 86.8% 0.9%
Action 4 137 2.9% 3.6% 89.1% 1.5%
Action 5 73 0.0% 8.2% 86.3% 2.7%
Action 6 42 2.4% 4.8% 90.5% 0.0%
Action 7 20 0.0% 5.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.8% 4 of 219 office actions
All years 2.1% 39 of 1,817 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.1%
2.0%
3.3%
2.3%
3.2%
2.7%
2014: Alice
1.9%
4.1%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
2.4%
0.0%
3.2%
2.4%
3.7%
2024: AI examples
2.4%
2025: August memo
0.0%
4.5%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 4/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 6/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.8 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 21, 2016 13/652,641 Reversed §102 · §103
Nov. 13, 2014 11/019,606 Reversed §103
Aug. 27, 2014 11/756,335 Reversed §102
Aug. 12, 2013 11/624,794 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Mar. 26, 2013 11/554,052 Reversed §103
Jul. 8, 2011 09/910,510 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 23, 2011 10/401,413 Affirmed N/A
Feb. 16, 2011 10/683,564 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.