Examiner Scott Christensen

Grant ratio: 72.2% (74th percentile in Art Unit 2444 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82113
Primary art unit
2444
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
1,021
Granted applications
737
Examiner phone
(571) 270-1144
Supervisor
John Follansbee
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3964

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 64.2% 2.35
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.42 2,467 office actions across 1,021 applications
Applications with office actions 97.7% 998 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 23 2.3%
1 OA 373 36.5%
2 OAs 286 28.0%
3 OAs 105 10.3%
4 OAs 108 10.6%
5+ OAs 126 12.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 45.5% 2008 2009: 48.8% 2009 2010: 52.3% 2010 2011: 62.9% 2011 2012: 75.4% 2012 2013: 80.0% 2013 2014: 74.2% 2014 2015: 74.1% 2015 2016: 83.6% 2016 2017: 74.1% 2017 2018: 82.9% 2018 2019: 88.3% 2019 2020: 91.5% 2020 2021: 80.3% 2021 2022: 86.9% 2022 2023: 82.4% 2023 2024: 89.4% 2024 2025: 52.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008221045.5%
2009412048.8%
2010442352.3%
2011352262.9%
2012654975.4%
2013453680.0%
2014664974.2%
2015584374.1%
2016615183.6%
2017544074.1%
2018705882.9%
2019605388.3%
2020716591.5%
2021614980.3%
2022615386.9%
2023514282.4%
2024474289.4%
2025613252.5%
20264800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 998 1.6% 7.7% 79.3% 3.4%
Action 2 625 0.8% 6.4% 89.1% 1.3%
Action 3 339 0.9% 3.8% 91.2% 1.5%
Action 4 234 0.4% 2.1% 92.3% 1.3%
Action 5 126 1.6% 2.4% 93.7% 2.4%
Action 6 73 0.0% 1.4% 95.9% 1.4%
Action 7 34 0.0% 2.9% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 8 16 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 9 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.0% 6 of 303 office actions
All years 1.1% 27 of 2,467 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2.2%
2.9%
0.0%
0.6%
0.5%
0.7%
2014: Alice
0.6%
0.7%
1.4%
1.5%
0.8%
2019: PEG
1.1%
0.0%
0.9%
1.1%
2.1%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
3.5%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 21. Merits outcomes: 13 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 6/21 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
38.1% 8/21 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.5 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 27, 2023 17/090,369 Affirmed §103
Jan. 28, 2020 13/955,711 Affirmed §103
Sep. 14, 2018 10/562,872 Reversed §102
Aug. 29, 2016 12/771,146 Reversed §103
Feb. 19, 2016 11/118,679 Affirmed §101 · §103
Sep. 3, 2015 12/849,655 Affirmed §103
Aug. 26, 2015 12/696,340 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 24, 2014 10/399,613 Reversed N/A
Apr. 22, 2014 10/675,001 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103
Mar. 13, 2014 12/020,905 Reversed §103
Jan. 27, 2014 11/094,028 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §103
Dec. 23, 2013 10/816,602 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.