Examiner Umar Cheema

Grant ratio: 63.5% (58th percentile in Art Unit 2444 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.59. Most common rejection type: §103.

Potentially inactive Last office action in data: June 2026
Grant ratio 63.5%
Average office actions / grant 3.59
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
83409
Primary art unit
2444
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
230
Granted applications
146

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 64.2% 2.35
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.15 724 office actions across 230 applications
Applications with office actions 97.4% 224 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 2.6%
1 OA 46 20.0%
2 OAs 53 23.0%
3 OAs 41 17.8%
4 OAs 34 14.8%
5+ OAs 50 21.7%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 25.0% 2008 2009: 36.8% 2009 2010: 65.2% 2010 2011: 72.0% 2011 2012: 77.1% 2012 2013: 82.1% 2013 2014: 100.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 0.0% 2016 2020: 0.0% 2020 2025: 20.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200820525.0%
200919736.8%
2010231565.2%
2011251872.0%
2012352777.1%
2013786482.1%
201499100.0%
2015100.0%
2016600.0%
2020500.0%
20255120.0%
2026400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 224 1.3% 25.0% 71.0% 0.0%
Action 2 178 1.7% 9.0% 87.6% 0.0%
Action 3 125 0.8% 4.8% 92.8% 0.0%
Action 4 84 1.2% 1.2% 94.0% 1.2%
Action 5 50 0.0% 0.0% 98.0% 0.0%
Action 6 33 0.0% 12.1% 87.9% 0.0%
Action 7 16 0.0% 6.3% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 8 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 11.1% 1 of 9 office actions
All years 1.1% 8 of 724 office actions
Change +10.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
0.8%
2.6%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
20.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 8/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
83.3% 10/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 25, 2016 12/575,385 Reversed §103
Dec. 21, 2015 13/038,801 Reversed N/A
Jun. 29, 2015 11/611,605 Reversed N/A
Nov. 4, 2014 11/586,709 Reversed N/A
Mar. 11, 2014 11/039,647 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 18, 2014 10/675,121 Reversed N/A
Dec. 3, 2013 10/947,858 Reversed §103
Oct. 31, 2013 11/276,586 Affirmed §103
Aug. 27, 2013 11/015,476 Reversed §103
Mar. 11, 2013 10/949,568 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103 · §112
May. 30, 2012 10/954,521 Reversed §103
Nov. 7, 2011 10/667,862 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.