Examiner Thomas Richardson

Grant ratio: 55.9% (30th percentile in Art Unit 2444 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.66. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: February 2017
Grant ratio 55.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.66
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84423
Primary art unit
2444
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
204
Granted applications
114

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 30 64.2% 2.35
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.43 700 office actions across 204 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 204 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 32 15.7%
2 OAs 50 24.5%
3 OAs 31 15.2%
4 OAs 43 21.1%
5+ OAs 48 23.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 50.0% 2008 2009: 58.3% 2009 2010: 47.6% 2010 2011: 53.8% 2011 2012: 51.9% 2012 2013: 61.5% 2013 2014: 60.0% 2014 2015: 78.6% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008201050.0%
2009241458.3%
2010211047.6%
2011261453.8%
2012271451.9%
201313861.5%
2014402460.0%
2015141178.6%
201618950.0%
2017100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 204 0.5% 22.5% 75.5% 0.5%
Action 2 172 0.0% 15.7% 83.1% 0.0%
Action 3 122 0.0% 5.7% 91.0% 0.0%
Action 4 91 0.0% 2.2% 96.7% 0.0%
Action 5 48 0.0% 2.1% 97.9% 0.0%
Action 6 34 2.9% 0.0% 97.1% 0.0%
Action 7 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 700 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
3.3%
3.8%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 4/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
58.3% 7/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 27, 2016 12/266,294 Affirmed §103
Sep. 29, 2015 11/460,789 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 11, 2015 12/603,362 Reversed N/A
May. 12, 2014 11/011,244 Affirmed in part §101 · §103
Mar. 31, 2014 11/057,103 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 7, 2014 11/078,911 Affirmed §103
Nov. 14, 2013 11/080,148 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 25, 2013 11/034,150 Reversed N/A
Jun. 18, 2013 11/049,808 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 17, 2012 10/940,558 Reversed N/A
Sep. 26, 2012 10/675,726 Granted-in-Part N/A
Nov. 29, 2011 11/050,293 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.