Examiner Farrukh Hussain

Grant ratio: 62.7% (56th percentile in Art Unit 2444 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.67. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: April 2016
Grant ratio 62.7%
Average office actions / grant 3.67
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85266
Primary art unit
2444
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
166
Granted applications
104

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 32 59.8% 2.35
Group 210 54.6% 2.42
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.40 565 office actions across 166 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 166 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 24 14.5%
2 OAs 51 30.7%
3 OAs 20 12.0%
4 OAs 27 16.3%
5+ OAs 44 26.5%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 33.3% 2008 2009: 33.3% 2009 2010: 59.3% 2010 2011: 71.9% 2011 2012: 63.0% 2012 2013: 85.2% 2013 2014: 52.9% 2014 2015: 70.0% 2015 2016: 40.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20083133.3%
200918633.3%
2010271659.3%
2011322371.9%
2012271763.0%
2013272385.2%
201417952.9%
201510770.0%
20165240.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 166 0.0% 27.7% 71.1% 0.6%
Action 2 142 0.0% 13.4% 85.9% 0.0%
Action 3 91 2.2% 5.5% 92.3% 0.0%
Action 4 71 0.0% 4.2% 95.8% 0.0%
Action 5 44 2.3% 4.5% 93.2% 0.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 7.4% 92.6% 0.0%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.5% 3 of 565 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 17. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
53.3% 8/15 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 12/15 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.9 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 10, 2017 12/757,306 Affirmed §103
Dec. 3, 2015 12/590,533 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 1, 2015 12/227,709 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 26, 2015 12/400,526 Reversed N/A
Jan. 29, 2015 12/414,084 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 30, 2014 11/524,680 Affirmed in part N/A
Oct. 28, 2014 12/022,241 Reversed N/A
Sep. 22, 2014 12/266,196 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
May. 20, 2014 11/005,529 Rehearing Decision-Granted §101 · §103
Apr. 25, 2014 10/593,314 Reversed §103
Jan. 31, 2014 11/136,206 Affirmed §103
Jan. 9, 2014 12/099,565 Affirmed in part §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.