Examiner Ajay Bhatia

Grant ratio: 62.6% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2445 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.97. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2026
Grant ratio 62.6%
Average office actions / grant 1.97
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80452
Primary art unit
2445
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
147
Granted applications
92

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 53.7% 2.46
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.11 318 office actions across 151 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 151 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 70 46.4%
2 OAs 42 27.8%
3 OAs 20 13.2%
4 OAs 3 2.0%
5+ OAs 16 10.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 100.0% 2007 2008: 73.7% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 87.5% 2010 2011: 78.1% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 100.0% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 16.7% 2018 2019: 0.0% 2019 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200711100.0%
2008191473.7%
2009251560.0%
2010403587.5%
2011322578.1%
2012100.0%
2013800.0%
2014200.0%
2015300.0%
201611100.0%
2017500.0%
20186116.7%
2019100.0%
2025100.0%
2026200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 151 3.3% 27.8% 66.2% 1.3%
Action 2 81 1.2% 25.9% 72.8% 0.0%
Action 3 39 0.0% 15.4% 84.6% 0.0%
Action 4 19 5.3% 10.5% 84.2% 0.0%
Action 5 16 0.0% 12.5% 87.5% 0.0%
Action 6 7 14.3% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 12 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 13 1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 4 office actions
All years 2.5% 8 of 318 office actions
Change -2.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.0%
1.4%
2.9%
7.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
5.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 26, 2017 13/328,816 Affirmed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.