Examiner Brian J. Gillis

Grant ratio: 70.5% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 2446 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.07. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.07
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80773
Primary art unit
2446
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
254
Granted applications
179
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7952
Supervisor
Brian Gillis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7952

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 58.8% 2.04
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.00 509 office actions across 254 applications
Applications with office actions 99.2% 252 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.8%
1 OA 102 40.2%
2 OAs 91 35.8%
3 OAs 30 11.8%
4 OAs 19 7.5%
5+ OAs 10 3.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 76.0% 2008 2009: 60.0% 2009 2010: 65.9% 2010 2011: 72.0% 2011 2012: 83.7% 2012 2013: 79.4% 2013 2014: 55.6% 2014 2018: 50.0% 2018 2025: 66.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008251976.0%
2009352160.0%
2010412765.9%
2011503672.0%
2012494183.7%
2013342779.4%
20149555.6%
20182150.0%
20253266.7%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 252 1.6% 8.7% 65.9% 5.2%
Action 2 150 1.3% 3.3% 82.7% 2.0%
Action 3 59 0.0% 3.4% 91.5% 5.1%
Action 4 29 0.0% 3.4% 96.6% 0.0%
Action 5 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 9 office actions
All years 1.2% 6 of 509 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
2.7%
1.4%
2.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 4 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 4/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
70.0% 7/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Feb. 23, 2016 12/887,830 Reversed §103
Mar. 13, 2015 12/277,182 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 17, 2014 11/678,268 Reversed N/A
Dec. 13, 2013 11/762,869 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Sep. 25, 2013 11/569,077 Affirmed in part N/A
May. 23, 2013 11/751,531 Reversed N/A
Mar. 27, 2013 10/854,532 Reversed §101 · §103
Dec. 12, 2012 11/204,465 Affirmed in part N/A
Nov. 2, 2011 10/252,815 Affirmed §103
Nov. 8, 2010 10/761,584 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.