Examiner Juan C Turriate Gastulo

Grant ratio: 62.9% (28th percentile in Art Unit 2446 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.80. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 62.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.80
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89332
Primary art unit
2446
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
418
Granted applications
263
Examiner phone
(571) 272-6707
Supervisor
Brian J Gillis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7952

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 58.8% 2.04
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.79 1,165 office actions across 418 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 418 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 120 28.7%
2 OAs 102 24.4%
3 OAs 68 16.3%
4 OAs 70 16.7%
5+ OAs 58 13.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2010: 100.0% 2010 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 35.7% 2013 2014: 64.1% 2014 2015: 76.0% 2015 2016: 67.5% 2016 2017: 77.4% 2017 2018: 64.9% 2018 2019: 80.0% 2019 2020: 80.6% 2020 2021: 90.0% 2021 2022: 74.1% 2022 2023: 65.0% 2023 2024: 78.6% 2024 2025: 35.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
201011100.0%
20122150.0%
201314535.7%
2014392564.1%
2015251976.0%
2016402767.5%
2017312477.4%
2018372464.9%
2019302480.0%
2020362980.6%
2021201890.0%
2022272074.1%
2023201365.0%
2024282278.6%
2025311135.5%
20263700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 418 0.0% 4.1% 94.0% 0.2%
Action 2 298 0.3% 2.7% 96.3% 0.3%
Action 3 196 1.0% 1.5% 97.4% 0.5%
Action 4 128 0.8% 0.0% 98.4% 0.0%
Action 5 58 0.0% 0.0% 98.3% 0.0%
Action 6 33 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 16 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 231 office actions
All years 0.3% 4 of 1,165 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.9%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 25, 2025 17/368,668 Affirmed §103
Apr. 3, 2019 14/574,744 Affirmed in part §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.