Examiner Javier O Guzman

Grant ratio: 72.3% (58th percentile in Art Unit 2446 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.10. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 72.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.10
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91978
Primary art unit
2446
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
375
Granted applications
271
Examiner phone
(571) 270-0588
Supervisor
Brian J Gillis
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7952

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 58.8% 2.04
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.99 745 office actions across 375 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 375 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 205 54.7%
2 OAs 76 20.3%
3 OAs 49 13.1%
4 OAs 23 6.1%
5+ OAs 22 5.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 80.0% 2016 2017: 82.1% 2017 2018: 72.7% 2018 2019: 78.9% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 89.7% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 93.5% 2023 2024: 82.9% 2024 2025: 55.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014100.0%
201512650.0%
2016252080.0%
2017282382.1%
2018332472.7%
2019191578.9%
2020362775.0%
2021393589.7%
2022322887.5%
2023312993.5%
2024413482.9%
2025543055.6%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 375 2.7% 17.3% 70.7% 4.0%
Action 2 170 5.3% 5.3% 88.2% 0.0%
Action 3 94 0.0% 5.3% 89.4% 1.1%
Action 4 45 0.0% 4.4% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 5 22 0.0% 4.5% 95.5% 0.0%
Action 6 17 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.2% 2 of 166 office actions
All years 2.6% 19 of 745 office actions
Change -1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
7.7%
8.3%
1.4%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
1.4%
6.6%
0.0%
2.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
1.5%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
66.7% 2/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
8.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 21, 2021 15/137,546 Affirmed §103
May. 24, 2019 13/920,635 Reversed §103
Jul. 24, 2017 14/061,517 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.