Examiner John Isom

Grant ratio: 2.4% (3rd percentile in Art Unit 2447 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.00. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 2.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.00
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78200
Primary art unit
2447
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
41
Granted applications
1
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7203
Supervisor
James Hwang
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4036

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 45.4% 2.84
Group 210 54.6% 2.42
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.39 98 office actions across 41 applications
Applications with office actions 85.4% 35 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 14.6%
1 OA 7 17.1%
2 OAs 16 39.0%
3 OAs 3 7.3%
4 OAs 4 9.8%
5+ OAs 5 12.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2010: 0.0% 2010 2011: 12.5% 2011 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015 2023: 0.0% 2023 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
2010600.0%
20118112.5%
2012900.0%
2013200.0%
2014100.0%
2015100.0%
2023100.0%
2024100.0%
2025300.0%
2026800.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 35 0.0% 25.7% 74.3% 2.9%
Action 2 28 0.0% 14.3% 82.1% 3.6%
Action 3 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 4 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 5 0.0% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0%
Action 6 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 15 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 98 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 24, 2017 13/058,434 Affirmed §103
Dec. 27, 2016 12/841,898 Affirmed §101 · §103
Nov. 19, 2015 13/104,108 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 24, 2015 11/260,993 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 21, 2015 11/617,835 Affirmed N/A
May. 21, 2013 10/537,714 Affirmed §102
Mar. 27, 2013 10/541,694 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 12, 2010 10/541,694 Remanded §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.