Examiner Abdulkader M Alriyashi

Grant ratio: 56.9% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 2447 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.61. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 56.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.61
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89155
Primary art unit
2447
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
429
Granted applications
244
Examiner phone
(313) 446-6551
Supervisor
Joon Hwang
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4036

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 45.4% 2.84
Group 210 54.6% 2.42
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.77 1,189 office actions across 429 applications
Applications with office actions 97.7% 419 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 2.3%
1 OA 136 31.7%
2 OAs 92 21.4%
3 OAs 63 14.7%
4 OAs 56 13.1%
5+ OAs 72 16.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 0.0% 2012 2013: 56.3% 2013 2014: 63.6% 2014 2015: 44.4% 2015 2016: 70.0% 2016 2017: 52.2% 2017 2018: 55.2% 2018 2019: 65.0% 2019 2020: 74.1% 2020 2021: 69.2% 2021 2022: 74.1% 2022 2023: 74.4% 2023 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 41.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2012300.0%
201316956.3%
2014221463.6%
2015271244.4%
2016302170.0%
2017231252.2%
2018291655.2%
2019402665.0%
2020272074.1%
2021261869.2%
2022272074.1%
2023433274.4%
2024353085.7%
2025341441.2%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 419 2.4% 7.9% 76.1% 8.6%
Action 2 283 1.1% 5.7% 88.7% 3.9%
Action 3 191 1.6% 3.1% 92.1% 3.1%
Action 4 128 0.0% 3.1% 92.2% 4.7%
Action 5 72 0.0% 1.4% 90.3% 8.3%
Action 6 43 0.0% 2.3% 93.0% 4.7%
Action 7 21 0.0% 4.8% 90.5% 4.8%
Action 8 16 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.0% 9 of 226 office actions
All years 1.3% 16 of 1,189 office actions
Change +2.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
2.8%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
3.8%
2025: August memo
4.2%
4.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
9.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 29, 2024 16/943,031 Affirmed §103
Aug. 9, 2024 17/205,045 Affirmed N/A
May. 5, 2021 14/862,765 Affirmed §102 · §103
Dec. 14, 2020 12/486,494 Reversed §103
Jun. 2, 2020 13/771,560 Affirmed §101 · §103 · §112
Apr. 10, 2019 15/465,004 Affirmed §103
Jul. 29, 2016 13/204,510 Reversed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.