Examiner Kaylee J Huang

Grant ratio: 61.3% (58th percentile in Art Unit 2447 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.26. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 61.3%
Average office actions / grant 2.26
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
91543
Primary art unit
2447
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
406
Granted applications
249
Examiner phone
(571) 272-0080
Supervisor
Joon H Hwang
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-4036

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 45.4% 2.84
Group 210 54.6% 2.42
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.34 952 office actions across 406 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 404 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.5%
1 OA 152 37.4%
2 OAs 119 29.3%
3 OAs 59 14.5%
4 OAs 30 7.4%
5+ OAs 44 10.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 45.8% 2015 2016: 68.0% 2016 2017: 55.0% 2017 2018: 65.5% 2018 2019: 76.7% 2019 2020: 83.0% 2020 2021: 81.3% 2021 2022: 85.0% 2022 2023: 80.5% 2023 2024: 78.6% 2024 2025: 47.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014100.0%
2015241145.8%
2016251768.0%
2017201155.0%
2018291965.5%
2019302376.7%
2020473983.0%
2021322681.3%
2022201785.0%
2023413380.5%
2024423378.6%
2025422047.6%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 404 0.0% 2.0% 85.9% 9.7%
Action 2 252 0.4% 0.8% 91.3% 6.7%
Action 3 133 0.0% 0.8% 91.0% 8.3%
Action 4 74 0.0% 0.0% 93.2% 5.4%
Action 5 44 0.0% 0.0% 95.5% 4.5%
Action 6 28 0.0% 0.0% 89.3% 7.1%
Action 7 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 252 office actions
All years 0.1% 1 of 952 office actions
Change -0.1 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.8 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 6, 2021 14/901,054 Affirmed §103
Dec. 16, 2020 14/901,049 Reversed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.