Examiner Thuong (Tina) Nguyen

Grant ratio: 60.4% (50th percentile in Art Unit 2449 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.28. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 60.4%
Average office actions / grant 3.28
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81561
Primary art unit
2449
Work group
2440
Technology center
2400
Applications
734
Granted applications
443
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3864
Supervisor
Vivek Srivastava
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7304

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 53.9% 2.37
Group 208 56.0% 2.42
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.10 2,274 office actions across 734 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 733 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 137 18.7%
2 OAs 186 25.3%
3 OAs 154 21.0%
4 OAs 121 16.5%
5+ OAs 135 18.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 51.5% 2008 2009: 54.8% 2009 2010: 73.3% 2010 2011: 71.4% 2011 2012: 78.0% 2012 2013: 75.0% 2013 2014: 73.0% 2014 2015: 78.3% 2015 2016: 58.3% 2016 2017: 58.3% 2017 2018: 66.7% 2018 2019: 73.7% 2019 2020: 75.0% 2020 2021: 91.7% 2021 2022: 64.1% 2022 2023: 70.3% 2023 2024: 58.8% 2024 2025: 22.7% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008331751.5%
2009422354.8%
2010302273.3%
2011352571.4%
2012413278.0%
2013523975.0%
2014372773.0%
2015231878.3%
2016482858.3%
2017362158.3%
2018392666.7%
2019382873.7%
2020523975.0%
2021242291.7%
2022392564.1%
2023372670.3%
2024342058.8%
202522522.7%
20267200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 733 0.4% 13.2% 84.7% 0.8%
Action 2 596 12.1% 5.0% 80.9% 1.2%
Action 3 410 7.6% 3.4% 87.6% 1.2%
Action 4 256 6.6% 2.0% 88.7% 1.2%
Action 5 135 4.4% 1.5% 90.4% 2.2%
Action 6 71 9.9% 0.0% 87.3% 1.4%
Action 7 35 2.9% 0.0% 94.3% 2.9%
Action 8 19 5.3% 0.0% 89.5% 5.3%
Action 9 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.3% 5 of 379 office actions
All years 6.1% 138 of 2,274 office actions
Change -4.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.7%
1.4%
2014: Alice
3.2%
4.6%
14.2%
24.1%
38.0%
2019: PEG
8.1%
0.0%
1.8%
0.9%
5.5%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
1.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 36. Merits outcomes: 10 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 22 reversed.

Full reversal rate
62.9% 22/35 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
71.4% 25/35 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.6 months
New grounds of rejection
4
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 13, 2026 17/652,787 Reversed §103
Apr. 29, 2024 17/407,121 Reversed New ground of rejection §101 · §103
Apr. 3, 2023 15/224,312 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 3, 2023 15/947,350 Reversed §103
Jul. 29, 2022 15/075,163 Reversed §103
Jul. 1, 2022 15/665,111 Reversed §103
Dec. 23, 2019 13/831,545 Affirmed in part §101 · §103 · §112
Dec. 20, 2018 14/308,993 Affirmed §103 · §112
Aug. 8, 2018 14/231,823 Reversed §103
Mar. 22, 2018 14/255,867 Affirmed §101 · §103
Mar. 22, 2018 14/231,707 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 30, 2018 14/051,842 Reversed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.