Examiner Kamal B. Divecha

Grant ratio: 23.4% (8th percentile in Art Unit 2451 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.86. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 23.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.86
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80631
Primary art unit
2451
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
184
Granted applications
43
Examiner phone
(571) 272-5863
Supervisor
Colleen Fauz
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-1667

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 55.7% 2.26
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.33 429 office actions across 184 applications
Applications with office actions 95.1% 175 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 9 4.9%
1 OA 78 42.4%
2 OAs 37 20.1%
3 OAs 18 9.8%
4 OAs 21 11.4%
5+ OAs 21 11.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 20.6% 2008 2009: 29.0% 2009 2010: 47.6% 2010 2011: 31.6% 2011 2012: 53.3% 2012 2013: 0.0% 2013 2015: 0.0% 2015 2016: 5.6% 2016 2017: 0.0% 2017 2018: 0.0% 2018 2020: 50.0% 2020 2021: 0.0% 2021 2022: 0.0% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 0.0% 2024 2025: 0.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200834720.6%
200931929.0%
2010211047.6%
201119631.6%
201215853.3%
2013500.0%
2015800.0%
20161815.6%
2017500.0%
2018100.0%
20202150.0%
2021100.0%
2022200.0%
202311100.0%
2024100.0%
2025300.0%
20261700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 175 0.0% 11.4% 88.6% 0.0%
Action 2 97 0.0% 4.1% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 3 60 0.0% 3.3% 95.0% 0.0%
Action 4 42 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 21 0.0% 4.8% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 6 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 36 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 429 office actions
Change 0.0 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 11, 2012 09/982,794 Reversed §103 · §112
Mar. 27, 2012 10/425,384 Affirmed §102
Jan. 13, 2012 11/348,259 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 8, 2011 09/944,057 Affirmed in part §103
Aug. 29, 2011 09/814,426 Affirmed §103
Apr. 18, 2011 10/284,966 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.