Examiner Anthony Mejia

Grant ratio: 78.5% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2451 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.09. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.09
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84303
Primary art unit
2451
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
726
Granted applications
570
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3630
Supervisor
Christopher Parry
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8328

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 21 55.7% 2.26
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.94 1,411 office actions across 726 applications
Applications with office actions 97.5% 708 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 18 2.5%
1 OA 376 51.8%
2 OAs 160 22.0%
3 OAs 70 9.6%
4 OAs 48 6.6%
5+ OAs 54 7.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 55.0% 2008 2009: 51.3% 2009 2010: 66.7% 2010 2011: 79.2% 2011 2012: 71.8% 2012 2013: 92.2% 2013 2014: 89.5% 2014 2015: 87.2% 2015 2016: 78.1% 2016 2017: 74.1% 2017 2018: 76.7% 2018 2019: 89.1% 2019 2020: 96.2% 2020 2021: 92.9% 2021 2022: 89.3% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 96.9% 2024 2025: 46.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008201155.0%
2009392051.3%
2010302066.7%
2011483879.2%
2012392871.8%
2013514792.2%
2014575189.5%
2015393487.2%
2016322578.1%
2017272074.1%
2018302376.7%
2019554989.1%
2020535196.2%
2021565292.9%
2022282589.3%
2023353085.7%
2024323196.9%
2025321546.9%
20262300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 708 4.2% 22.3% 58.8% 2.1%
Action 2 332 2.1% 7.2% 78.3% 2.1%
Action 3 172 1.7% 2.3% 91.3% 0.6%
Action 4 102 2.9% 2.0% 91.2% 1.0%
Action 5 54 1.9% 3.7% 79.6% 3.7%
Action 6 29 0.0% 3.4% 82.8% 3.4%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 8.3% 9 of 108 office actions
All years 3.1% 44 of 1,411 office actions
Change +5.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.5%
0.9%
1.6%
2.6%
0.0%
5.6%
2014: Alice
0.9%
1.6%
1.7%
7.9%
3.1%
2019: PEG
0.0%
2.2%
2.6%
18.8%
5.0%
2024: AI examples
8.3%
2025: August memo
11.1%
4.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
32.4 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 26, 2014 10/979,632 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 26, 2014 11/113,499 Reversed N/A
Jul. 24, 2014 11/864,365 Reversed N/A
May. 22, 2014 11/864,317 Reversed §103
Mar. 25, 2014 11/297,693 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 23, 2013 11/535,929 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.