Examiner Imad Hussain

Grant ratio: 78.2% (78th percentile in Art Unit 2453 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.05. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 78.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.05
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84223
Primary art unit
2453
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
601
Granted applications
470
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3628
Supervisor
Kamal Divecha
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5863

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 56.6% 2.90
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.05 1,232 office actions across 601 applications
Applications with office actions 99.7% 599 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.3%
1 OA 266 44.3%
2 OAs 172 28.6%
3 OAs 77 12.8%
4 OAs 49 8.2%
5+ OAs 35 5.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 50.0% 2007 2008: 35.3% 2008 2009: 65.9% 2009 2010: 64.3% 2010 2011: 89.1% 2011 2012: 77.8% 2012 2013: 80.0% 2013 2014: 84.2% 2014 2015: 80.0% 2015 2016: 83.7% 2016 2017: 97.3% 2017 2018: 85.7% 2018 2019: 91.7% 2019 2020: 88.5% 2020 2021: 89.3% 2021 2022: 90.0% 2022 2023: 92.9% 2023 2024: 71.4% 2024 2025: 40.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20072150.0%
200817635.3%
2009412765.9%
2010281864.3%
2011464189.1%
2012453577.8%
2013352880.0%
2014383284.2%
2015302480.0%
2016494183.7%
2017373697.3%
2018353085.7%
2019363391.7%
2020262388.5%
2021282589.3%
2022201890.0%
2023282692.9%
2024282071.4%
202515640.0%
20261700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 599 3.8% 6.3% 77.3% 2.0%
Action 2 333 6.6% 4.2% 79.9% 4.5%
Action 3 161 4.3% 1.9% 82.6% 6.8%
Action 4 84 3.6% 2.4% 86.9% 3.6%
Action 5 35 2.9% 5.7% 85.7% 5.7%
Action 6 15 6.7% 0.0% 86.7% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 2.1% 2 of 96 office actions
All years 4.6% 57 of 1,232 office actions
Change -2.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
9.9%
5.3%
5.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
12.5%
8.5%
4.3%
11.7%
4.7%
2019: PEG
2.0%
0.0%
0.0%
6.3%
2.3%
2024: AI examples
4.8%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 6. Merits outcomes: 4 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
34.3 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 8, 2015 12/481,179 Affirmed §103
May. 29, 2014 12/097,759 Affirmed in part N/A
Mar. 26, 2014 11/337,984 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 25, 2013 11/334,232 Affirmed §103
Mar. 27, 2013 11/091,278 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Nov. 27, 2012 11/092,226 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.