Examiner Tariq Najee-Ullah

Grant ratio: 42.5% (18th percentile in Art Unit 2453 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 4.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: November 2016
Grant ratio 42.5%
Average office actions / grant 4.40
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84480
Primary art unit
2453
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
212
Granted applications
90

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 56.6% 2.90
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.82 810 office actions across 212 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 212 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 36 17.0%
2 OAs 33 15.6%
3 OAs 31 14.6%
4 OAs 40 18.9%
5+ OAs 72 34.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 42.9% 2008 2009: 19.2% 2009 2010: 18.2% 2010 2011: 40.0% 2011 2012: 27.8% 2012 2013: 48.7% 2013 2014: 57.1% 2014 2015: 50.0% 2015 2016: 56.0% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
200814642.9%
200926519.2%
201011218.2%
201120840.0%
201218527.8%
2013391948.7%
2014281657.1%
2015301550.0%
2016251456.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 212 0.0% 14.6% 84.0% 0.5%
Action 2 176 0.0% 6.3% 93.2% 0.0%
Action 3 143 0.0% 4.2% 94.4% 0.7%
Action 4 112 0.0% 2.7% 97.3% 0.0%
Action 5 72 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 1.4%
Action 6 47 0.0% 0.0% 97.9% 2.1%
Action 7 25 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 15 0.0% 0.0% 93.3% 6.7%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.0% 0 of 810 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 12. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 3 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 3/12 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 6/12 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 29, 2016 12/469,647 Affirmed in part §103
May. 26, 2016 12/791,789 Affirmed §103
Mar. 21, 2016 12/146,887 Affirmed §103
Mar. 17, 2015 12/404,736 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 11, 2015 11/539,976 Reversed §103
Oct. 31, 2013 10/926,653 Affirmed N/A
Sep. 19, 2013 10/794,971 Reversed N/A
Aug. 29, 2013 11/368,395 Affirmed in part N/A
May. 23, 2013 10/930,977 Affirmed N/A
May. 21, 2012 10/635,587 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 26, 2012 10/772,881 Reversed N/A
Apr. 25, 2012 10/773,649 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.