Examiner Matthew S. Lindsey

Grant ratio: 23.9% (3rd percentile in Art Unit 2453 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 4.29. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: August 2015
Grant ratio 23.9%
Average office actions / grant 4.29
Compared with Art unit Very hard
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
84637
Primary art unit
2453
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
117
Granted applications
28

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 56.6% 2.90
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.25 380 office actions across 117 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 117 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 27 23.1%
2 OAs 25 21.4%
3 OAs 11 9.4%
4 OAs 29 24.8%
5+ OAs 25 21.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2007: 0.0% 2007 2008: 16.7% 2008 2009: 15.8% 2009 2010: 26.3% 2010 2011: 28.6% 2011 2012: 31.3% 2012 2013: 35.0% 2013 2014: 16.7% 2014 2015: 0.0% 2015

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2007100.0%
200812216.7%
200919315.8%
201019526.3%
201114428.6%
201216531.3%
201320735.0%
201412216.7%
2015400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 117 3.4% 9.4% 87.2% 0.0%
Action 2 90 21.1% 5.6% 65.6% 6.7%
Action 3 65 10.8% 4.6% 81.5% 3.1%
Action 4 54 14.8% 5.6% 74.1% 5.6%
Action 5 25 8.0% 4.0% 88.0% 0.0%
Action 6 15 26.7% 0.0% 66.7% 6.7%
Action 7 9 22.2% 0.0% 77.8% 0.0%
Action 8 4 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 12.6% 48 of 380 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
11.4%
17.1%
24.2%
10.2%
13.2%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
18.2% 2/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
36.4% 4/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
31.3 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 17, 2015 11/421,483 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 30, 2015 12/179,279 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 21, 2014 11/094,092 Reversed N/A
Oct. 28, 2014 11/334,210 Affirmed §103
Sep. 16, 2014 12/146,210 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 18, 2014 10/578,646 Affirmed §103
Jun. 18, 2014 10/523,021 Affirmed N/A
Apr. 11, 2014 11/952,838 Affirmed in part N/A
Mar. 20, 2014 11/421,591 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §101
Mar. 25, 2013 11/050,970 Affirmed N/A
Jan. 17, 2012 10/809,175 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.