Examiner Sandarva Khanal

Grant ratio: 50.9% (38th percentile in Art Unit 2453 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.81. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 50.9%
Average office actions / grant 2.81
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO Very hard

Examiner record

Examiner ID
93474
Primary art unit
2453
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
212
Granted applications
108
Examiner phone
(571) 272-8107
Supervisor
Kamal B Divecha
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-5863

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 22 56.6% 2.90
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.85 604 office actions across 212 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 211 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.5%
1 OA 59 27.8%
2 OAs 53 25.0%
3 OAs 32 15.1%
4 OAs 37 17.5%
5+ OAs 30 14.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2017: 28.6% 2017 2018: 53.3% 2018 2019: 37.5% 2019 2020: 47.6% 2020 2021: 64.3% 2021 2022: 63.2% 2022 2023: 76.9% 2023 2024: 78.4% 2024 2025: 42.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20177228.6%
201815853.3%
201916637.5%
2020211047.6%
202114964.3%
2022191263.2%
2023262076.9%
2024372978.4%
2025281242.9%
20262900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 211 1.4% 1.9% 90.0% 4.3%
Action 2 152 1.3% 2.6% 92.8% 2.0%
Action 3 99 3.0% 0.0% 96.0% 1.0%
Action 4 67 3.0% 0.0% 95.5% 3.0%
Action 5 30 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 20 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 87.5% 12.5%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 4.5% 8 of 178 office actions
All years 1.7% 10 of 604 office actions
Change +2.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.4%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
6.7%
11.4%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 9. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 3/9 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
44.4% 4/9 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 10, 2026 17/648,619 Affirmed §103
May. 21, 2026 17/447,597 Affirmed §103 · §112
Dec. 18, 2025 17/884,057 Affirmed §103
Dec. 22, 2022 16/855,443 Affirmed §103
Apr. 14, 2022 16/195,996 Reversed N/A
Mar. 2, 2022 15/188,312 Reversed §103
Dec. 24, 2021 14/870,600 Affirmed in part §102 · §103 · §120
Jan. 3, 2020 14/813,516 Affirmed §101 · §103
Dec. 3, 2019 14/870,675 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.