Examiner Robert Shaw

Grant ratio: 64.1% (53rd percentile in Art Unit 2455 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.78. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: July 2026
Grant ratio 64.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.78
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85306
Primary art unit
2455
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
206
Granted applications
132
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5643
Supervisor
Emmanuel Moise
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3865

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 48.5% 2.33
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.54 524 office actions across 206 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 206 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 64 31.1%
2 OAs 59 28.6%
3 OAs 33 16.0%
4 OAs 27 13.1%
5+ OAs 23 11.2%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 33.3% 2008 2009: 68.4% 2009 2010: 71.0% 2010 2011: 60.0% 2011 2012: 57.1% 2012 2013: 64.7% 2013 2014: 85.7% 2014 2015: 53.8% 2015 2016: 75.0% 2016 2017: 50.0% 2017 2018: 54.5% 2018 2019: 100.0% 2019 2020: 60.0% 2020 2021: 77.8% 2021 2022: 87.5% 2022 2023: 100.0% 2023 2024: 85.7% 2024 2025: 28.6% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20083133.3%
2009191368.4%
2010312271.0%
201115960.0%
2012211257.1%
2013171164.7%
2014141285.7%
201513753.8%
20164375.0%
20176350.0%
201811654.5%
201911100.0%
202010660.0%
20219777.8%
20228787.5%
202344100.0%
20247685.7%
20257228.6%
2026600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 206 0.5% 2.4% 93.2% 3.4%
Action 2 142 1.4% 3.5% 92.3% 1.4%
Action 3 83 0.0% 1.2% 97.6% 0.0%
Action 4 50 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 5 23 4.3% 0.0% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 6 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 27 office actions
All years 0.8% 4 of 524 office actions
Change -0.8 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

5.3%
1.6%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 10, 2015 12/234,678 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 2, 2014 12/017,545 Affirmed §103
Oct. 2, 2014 12/017,534 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.