Examiner Van Kim T. Nguyen

Grant ratio: 60.6% (41st percentile in Art Unit 2456 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2016
Grant ratio 60.6%
Average office actions / grant 3.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78707
Primary art unit
2456
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
213
Granted applications
129

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 19 53.0% 2.80
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.12 665 office actions across 213 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 213 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 53 24.9%
2 OAs 49 23.0%
3 OAs 28 13.1%
4 OAs 37 17.4%
5+ OAs 46 21.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 38.5% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 65.6% 2010 2011: 57.7% 2011 2012: 40.9% 2012 2013: 58.6% 2013 2014: 67.6% 2014 2015: 66.7% 2015 2016: 93.3% 2016

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
200813538.5%
200918950.0%
2010322165.6%
2011261557.7%
201222940.9%
2013291758.6%
2014342367.6%
2015241666.7%
2016151493.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 213 0.5% 13.1% 83.1% 0.9%
Action 2 160 0.6% 5.0% 93.8% 0.6%
Action 3 111 0.0% 4.5% 95.5% 0.0%
Action 4 83 0.0% 4.8% 95.2% 0.0%
Action 5 46 0.0% 4.3% 95.7% 0.0%
Action 6 32 0.0% 6.3% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 12.5% 75.0% 12.5%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.3% 2 of 665 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.3%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.0 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 26, 2016 12/817,349 Affirmed §101 · §103
Jul. 18, 2016 12/565,650 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 28, 2016 10/403,596 Reversed New ground of rejection N/A
Mar. 31, 2016 12/313,835 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 1, 2015 12/269,151 Reversed N/A
Jun. 19, 2015 12/727,499 Granted N/A
May. 4, 2015 11/321,326 Affirmed §103
Nov. 12, 2014 11/316,405 Affirmed §103
Mar. 4, 2014 11/864,486 Dismissed N/A
Oct. 31, 2012 10/654,619 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.