Examiner Kidest Mendaye

Grant ratio: 70.4% (30th percentile in Art Unit 2457 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.14. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 70.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.14
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88703
Primary art unit
2457
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
392
Granted applications
276
Examiner phone
(571) 272-2603

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 68.2% 2.18
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.13 833 office actions across 392 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 392 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 159 40.6%
2 OAs 119 30.4%
3 OAs 57 14.5%
4 OAs 35 8.9%
5+ OAs 22 5.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 66.7% 2012 2013: 70.8% 2013 2014: 73.9% 2014 2015: 73.3% 2015 2016: 82.1% 2016 2017: 71.0% 2017 2018: 80.8% 2018 2019: 90.6% 2019 2020: 76.5% 2020 2021: 96.0% 2021 2022: 85.2% 2022 2023: 85.7% 2023 2024: 79.3% 2024 2025: 37.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20123266.7%
2013241770.8%
2014231773.9%
2015151173.3%
2016282382.1%
2017312271.0%
2018262180.8%
2019322990.6%
2020342676.5%
2021252496.0%
2022272385.2%
2023282485.7%
2024292379.3%
2025371437.8%
20263000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 392 1.8% 1.5% 89.0% 1.3%
Action 2 233 0.4% 1.3% 96.1% 0.0%
Action 3 114 0.9% 0.0% 98.2% 0.0%
Action 4 57 0.0% 0.0% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 5 22 0.0% 4.5% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 6 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.6% 3 of 187 office actions
All years 1.1% 9 of 833 office actions
Change +0.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
5.1%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
3.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
3.3%
2.9%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 26, 2026 17/354,929 Affirmed §103
May. 8, 2020 14/596,796 Reversed §103
May. 31, 2019 14/684,552 Reversed §103
Nov. 10, 2016 13/517,281 Affirmed in part §101 · §102 · §103
Aug. 11, 2016 13/208,186 Affirmed in part §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.