Examiner Emad H Siddiqi

Grant ratio: 66.2% (47th percentile in Art Unit 2458 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.84. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: March 2025
Grant ratio 66.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.84
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
90208
Primary art unit
2458
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
284
Granted applications
188

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 53.4% 2.52
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.80 837 office actions across 299 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 299 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 86 28.8%
2 OAs 74 24.7%
3 OAs 57 19.1%
4 OAs 34 11.4%
5+ OAs 48 16.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2013: 60.0% 2013 2014: 52.4% 2014 2015: 31.6% 2015 2016: 50.0% 2016 2017: 70.8% 2017 2018: 50.0% 2018 2019: 78.3% 2019 2020: 60.0% 2020 2021: 87.5% 2021 2022: 83.9% 2022 2023: 70.4% 2023 2024: 84.2% 2024 2025: 54.5% 2025

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20135360.0%
2014211152.4%
201519631.6%
201614750.0%
2017241770.8%
2018381950.0%
2019231878.3%
2020201260.0%
2021322887.5%
2022312683.9%
2023271970.4%
2024191684.2%
202511654.5%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 299 0.3% 22.4% 73.2% 0.7%
Action 2 213 1.4% 10.8% 86.9% 0.0%
Action 3 139 2.2% 0.7% 94.2% 1.4%
Action 4 82 2.4% 0.0% 96.3% 1.2%
Action 5 48 2.1% 0.0% 97.9% 0.0%
Action 6 29 13.8% 0.0% 82.8% 3.4%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 9 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 85 office actions
All years 1.7% 14 of 837 office actions
Change -1.7 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
4.4%
8.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
40.0% 2/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
10.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 26, 2023 16/966,535 Affirmed in part §102 · §112
Mar. 29, 2021 13/873,401 Reversed §103
Sep. 1, 2020 14/162,731 Affirmed §101 · §103
Sep. 27, 2017 14/340,360 Affirmed §101
Aug. 2, 2016 13/318,796 Reversed §102 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.