Examiner Dae Kim

Grant ratio: 73.8% (72nd percentile in Art Unit 2458 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.06. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: June 2024
Grant ratio 73.8%
Average office actions / grant 3.06
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
92044
Primary art unit
2458
Work group
2450
Technology center
2400
Applications
214
Granted applications
158

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 53.4% 2.52
Group 210 57.4% 2.41
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 3.04 708 office actions across 233 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 233 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 52 22.3%
2 OAs 58 24.9%
3 OAs 48 20.6%
4 OAs 33 14.2%
5+ OAs 42 18.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2014: 0.0% 2014 2015: 36.4% 2015 2016: 60.0% 2016 2017: 59.1% 2017 2018: 72.7% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 71.4% 2020 2021: 88.9% 2021 2022: 72.7% 2022 2023: 96.3% 2023 2024: 100.0% 2024

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2014200.0%
201511436.4%
2016201260.0%
2017221359.1%
2018221672.7%
2019241875.0%
2020282071.4%
2021272488.9%
2022221672.7%
2023272696.3%
202499100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 233 0.4% 1.7% 96.6% 0.9%
Action 2 181 1.1% 0.0% 96.7% 2.2%
Action 3 123 0.8% 0.8% 96.7% 1.6%
Action 4 75 4.0% 1.3% 94.7% 0.0%
Action 5 42 2.4% 0.0% 97.6% 0.0%
Action 6 25 4.0% 0.0% 96.0% 0.0%
Action 7 13 0.0% 0.0% 92.3% 7.7%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.0% 0 of 51 office actions
All years 1.3% 9 of 708 office actions
Change -1.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
6.7%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 4. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 2/4 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
75.0% 3/4 decisions
Median appeal duration
18.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Nov. 2, 2022 15/904,495 Affirmed §103
Jun. 20, 2022 15/220,317 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 14, 2020 14/496,868 Reversed §101 · §103
Apr. 14, 2020 14/096,300 Reversed §101 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.