Examiner Khoa Huynh

Grant ratio: 74.0% (43rd percentile in Art Unit 2462 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.41. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 74.0%
Average office actions / grant 2.41
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85737
Primary art unit
2462
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
707
Granted applications
523
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7185
Supervisor
Yemane Mesfin
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3927

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 66.0% 2.10
Group 225 60.1% 2.07
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.39 1,693 office actions across 707 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 706 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 286 40.5%
2 OAs 187 26.4%
3 OAs 83 11.7%
4 OAs 61 8.6%
5+ OAs 89 12.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 20.0% 2008 2009: 65.0% 2009 2010: 68.2% 2010 2011: 55.0% 2011 2012: 73.7% 2012 2013: 81.4% 2013 2014: 75.0% 2014 2015: 79.5% 2015 2016: 70.5% 2016 2017: 71.4% 2017 2018: 65.9% 2018 2019: 90.2% 2019 2020: 92.9% 2020 2021: 95.1% 2021 2022: 89.1% 2022 2023: 96.6% 2023 2024: 89.2% 2024 2025: 46.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20085120.0%
2009201365.0%
2010221568.2%
2011402255.0%
2012382873.7%
2013433581.4%
2014564275.0%
2015393179.5%
2016443170.5%
2017423071.4%
2018412765.9%
2019514690.2%
2020423992.9%
2021413995.1%
2022464189.1%
2023292896.6%
2024373389.2%
2025472246.8%
20262400.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 706 4.1% 9.2% 65.3% 10.9%
Action 2 420 3.1% 4.5% 74.0% 14.8%
Action 3 233 2.6% 1.7% 76.0% 18.5%
Action 4 150 0.0% 0.7% 86.0% 9.3%
Action 5 89 0.0% 0.0% 84.3% 14.6%
Action 6 47 2.1% 0.0% 87.2% 8.5%
Action 7 27 0.0% 3.7% 70.4% 22.2%
Action 8 14 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6%
Action 9 6 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 16.7%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.8% 6 of 160 office actions
All years 2.9% 49 of 1,693 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
8.2%
5.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
2014: Alice
5.2%
2.0%
4.5%
5.6%
1.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
2024: AI examples
3.7%
2025: August memo
3.6%
3.6%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 5. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 3 reversed.

Full reversal rate
60.0% 3/5 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
80.0% 4/5 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jan. 31, 2018 14/290,471 Reversed §103 · §112
Nov. 16, 2016 11/917,112 Affirmed in part §103 · §112
Oct. 13, 2015 12/626,862 Affirmed N/A
Aug. 5, 2015 12/022,486 Reversed N/A
Jun. 30, 2014 12/071,982 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.