Examiner Mang Yeung

Grant ratio: 80.1% (67th percentile in Art Unit 2463 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.88. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 80.1%
Average office actions / grant 1.88
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85727
Primary art unit
2463
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
779
Granted applications
624
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7319

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 26 62.4% 1.80
Group 225 60.1% 2.07
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.90 1,478 office actions across 779 applications
Applications with office actions 99.5% 775 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 4 0.5%
1 OA 426 54.7%
2 OAs 194 24.9%
3 OAs 58 7.4%
4 OAs 52 6.7%
5+ OAs 45 5.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 80.0% 2009 2010: 76.3% 2010 2011: 86.5% 2011 2012: 80.0% 2012 2013: 84.2% 2013 2014: 81.8% 2014 2015: 92.2% 2015 2016: 87.8% 2016 2017: 89.7% 2017 2018: 80.0% 2018 2019: 88.3% 2019 2020: 90.0% 2020 2021: 89.1% 2021 2022: 89.5% 2022 2023: 91.1% 2023 2024: 90.4% 2024 2025: 54.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008200.0%
2009252080.0%
2010382976.3%
2011373286.5%
2012352880.0%
2013383284.2%
2014332781.8%
2015514792.2%
2016413687.8%
2017393589.7%
2018403280.0%
2019605388.3%
2020504590.0%
2021554989.1%
2022383489.5%
2023565191.1%
2024524790.4%
2025502754.0%
20263900.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 775 2.8% 20.6% 60.8% 5.8%
Action 2 349 0.9% 15.5% 73.1% 6.0%
Action 3 155 0.6% 12.9% 78.7% 2.6%
Action 4 97 0.0% 12.4% 81.4% 1.0%
Action 5 45 0.0% 13.3% 82.2% 4.4%
Action 6 30 0.0% 13.3% 80.0% 3.3%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 8 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 3 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 3.3% 7 of 215 office actions
All years 1.8% 26 of 1,478 office actions
Change +1.5 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
5.6%
8.1%
1.2%
2019: PEG
0.0%
3.3%
0.0%
1.1%
2.5%
2024: AI examples
1.3%
2025: August memo
5.4%
4.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 2/6 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 3/6 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.1 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 20, 2023 16/544,604 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 30, 2015 12/133,042 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 24, 2015 12/364,975 Reversed N/A
Nov. 12, 2014 11/827,498 Affirmed in part N/A
Feb. 27, 2014 11/750,446 Affirmed §102 · §103
Jan. 30, 2014 12/133,126 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 10, 2011 11/827,498 Remanded N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.