Examiner Dewanda Samuel

Grant ratio: 86.2% (88th percentile in Art Unit 2464 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.33. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: May 2018
Grant ratio 86.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.33
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82535
Primary art unit
2464
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
523
Granted applications
451

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 67.1% 1.93
Group 225 60.1% 2.07
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.33 1,245 office actions across 535 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 535 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 225 42.1%
2 OAs 124 23.2%
3 OAs 77 14.4%
4 OAs 51 9.5%
5+ OAs 58 10.8%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 82.2% 2008 2009: 83.9% 2009 2010: 84.1% 2010 2011: 88.1% 2011 2012: 87.8% 2012 2013: 89.7% 2013 2014: 83.1% 2014 2015: 87.9% 2015 2016: 91.3% 2016 2017: 88.2% 2017 2018: 100.0% 2018

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008453782.2%
2009625283.9%
2010826984.1%
2011675988.1%
2012413687.8%
2013585289.7%
2014715983.1%
2015332987.9%
2016464291.3%
2017171588.2%
201811100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 535 1.3% 7.9% 86.4% 1.3%
Action 2 310 4.5% 2.6% 87.4% 1.0%
Action 3 186 5.4% 2.7% 89.2% 1.6%
Action 4 109 5.5% 1.8% 90.8% 1.8%
Action 5 58 10.3% 8.6% 77.6% 0.0%
Action 6 33 21.2% 6.1% 69.7% 0.0%
Action 7 11 9.1% 9.1% 81.8% 0.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 4.1% 51 of 1,245 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.1%
9.5%
11.2%
2.0%
0.7%
2014: Alice
1.6%
0.0%
2.7%
6.7%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 20, 2016 12/577,526 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 20, 2013 10/993,928 Affirmed §102 · §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.