Examiner Rasheed Gidado

Grant ratio: 80.2% (64th percentile in Art Unit 2464 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.04. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 80.2%
Average office actions / grant 2.04
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86380
Primary art unit
2464
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
1,070
Granted applications
858
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7645
Supervisor
Ricky Ngo
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-3139

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 66.5% 1.93
Group 231 58.0% 2.07
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.02 2,166 office actions across 1,070 applications
Applications with office actions 99.4% 1,064 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 6 0.6%
1 OA 467 43.6%
2 OAs 332 31.0%
3 OAs 126 11.8%
4 OAs 87 8.1%
5+ OAs 52 4.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 78.9% 2009 2010: 76.6% 2010 2011: 75.4% 2011 2012: 76.5% 2012 2013: 82.2% 2013 2014: 83.1% 2014 2015: 86.7% 2015 2016: 85.1% 2016 2017: 87.0% 2017 2018: 92.9% 2018 2019: 89.1% 2019 2020: 88.6% 2020 2021: 91.2% 2021 2022: 89.2% 2022 2023: 92.9% 2023 2024: 88.9% 2024 2025: 50.0% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2009383078.9%
2010473676.6%
2011614675.4%
2012513976.5%
2013736082.2%
2014715983.1%
2015605286.7%
2016746385.1%
2017696087.0%
2018706592.9%
2019645789.1%
2020706288.6%
2021575291.2%
2022655889.2%
2023423992.9%
2024635688.9%
2025482450.0%
20264700.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,064 1.5% 6.2% 67.7% 10.4%
Action 2 597 0.7% 4.7% 81.6% 4.7%
Action 3 265 0.4% 1.9% 87.5% 4.2%
Action 4 139 1.4% 2.2% 87.8% 3.6%
Action 5 52 0.0% 3.8% 80.8% 5.8%
Action 6 27 0.0% 7.4% 81.5% 0.0%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 6 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.7% 2 of 269 office actions
All years 1.1% 23 of 2,166 office actions
Change -0.3 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.7%
2.2%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.7%
0.7%
1.4%
2.3%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.8%
1.0%
2.0%
1.1%
2024: AI examples
1.7%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 3 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
21.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Sep. 30, 2022 16/128,415 Affirmed §103
Sep. 30, 2016 11/517,020 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 15, 2015 12/626,975 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.