Examiner Najeeb Ansari

Grant ratio: 55.9% (40th percentile in Art Unit 2468 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 3.06. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 55.9%
Average office actions / grant 3.06
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center Very hard
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85997
Primary art unit
2468
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
510
Granted applications
285
Examiner phone
(571) 270-5446
Supervisor
Asad Nawaz
Supervisor phone
(469) 295-9193

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 48.5% 2.47
Group 225 60.1% 2.07
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.87 1,466 office actions across 510 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 510 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 144 28.2%
2 OAs 133 26.1%
3 OAs 79 15.5%
4 OAs 64 12.5%
5+ OAs 90 17.6%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 0.0% 2009 2010: 50.0% 2010 2011: 31.8% 2011 2012: 50.0% 2012 2013: 52.9% 2013 2014: 62.5% 2014 2015: 48.5% 2015 2016: 52.2% 2016 2017: 69.7% 2017 2018: 61.3% 2018 2019: 66.7% 2019 2020: 82.9% 2020 2021: 87.0% 2021 2022: 83.9% 2022 2023: 71.4% 2023 2024: 79.3% 2024 2025: 36.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008100.0%
20091200.0%
2010281450.0%
201122731.8%
201216850.0%
2013341852.9%
2014241562.5%
2015331648.5%
2016231252.2%
2017332369.7%
2018311961.3%
2019271866.7%
2020413482.9%
2021232087.0%
2022312683.9%
2023282071.4%
2024292379.3%
2025331236.4%
20264100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 510 0.2% 23.7% 73.5% 0.6%
Action 2 366 8.7% 10.7% 64.8% 15.0%
Action 3 233 5.2% 5.2% 84.1% 5.2%
Action 4 154 3.2% 3.2% 81.2% 12.3%
Action 5 90 3.3% 2.2% 87.8% 6.7%
Action 6 60 5.0% 3.3% 88.3% 3.3%
Action 7 29 0.0% 3.4% 75.9% 20.7%
Action 8 15 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0%
Action 10 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.9% 2 of 217 office actions
All years 3.8% 56 of 1,466 office actions
Change -2.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.6%
10.5%
9.4%
2014: Alice
10.0%
2.3%
2.7%
4.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
4.8%
2.4%
0.0%
1.4%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
2.7%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 7. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 2 reversed.

Full reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
28.6% 2/7 decisions
Median appeal duration
22.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 15, 2022 13/244,872 Reversed §103
Apr. 2, 2021 15/350,853 Affirmed §103
Aug. 24, 2016 13/730,287 Affirmed §103
Aug. 15, 2016 11/535,882 Affirmed §103
Feb. 24, 2016 11/227,763 Reversed §102
Feb. 18, 2016 11/502,570 Affirmed §103
Dec. 21, 2015 11/967,338 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.