Examiner Kiet Tang

Grant ratio: 82.9% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2469 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.51. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 82.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.51
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
85666
Primary art unit
2469
Work group
2460
Technology center
2400
Applications
843
Granted applications
699
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7193

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 24 65.3% 1.88
Group 231 58.0% 2.07
Tech Center 1,771 57.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,620 51.8% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.52 1,283 office actions across 843 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 843 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 592 70.2%
2 OAs 151 17.9%
3 OAs 45 5.3%
4 OAs 37 4.4%
5+ OAs 18 2.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 0.0% 2008 2009: 50.0% 2009 2010: 58.8% 2010 2011: 75.8% 2011 2012: 77.3% 2012 2013: 88.2% 2013 2014: 89.8% 2014 2015: 95.7% 2015 2016: 93.4% 2016 2017: 91.4% 2017 2018: 87.3% 2018 2019: 94.7% 2019 2020: 97.9% 2020 2021: 96.2% 2021 2022: 98.1% 2022 2023: 98.2% 2023 2024: 96.5% 2024 2025: 65.9% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008200.0%
2009241250.0%
2010171058.8%
2011332575.8%
2012443477.3%
2013343088.2%
2014494489.8%
2015464495.7%
2016615793.4%
2017585391.4%
2018554887.3%
2019575494.7%
2020484797.9%
2021535196.2%
2022525198.1%
2023565598.2%
2024575596.5%
2025442965.9%
20265300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 843 0.9% 4.4% 87.3% 1.5%
Action 2 251 0.0% 1.6% 94.4% 0.4%
Action 3 100 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 4 55 0.0% 0.0% 96.4% 1.8%
Action 5 18 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 10 0.0% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0%
Action 7 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.5% 3 of 198 office actions
All years 0.6% 8 of 1,283 office actions
Change +0.9 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-23–2026-10-23. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
2019: PEG
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
1.6%
2024: AI examples
1.6%
2025: August memo
1.6%
1.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 10. Merits outcomes: 7 affirmed, 2 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
10.0% 1/10 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
30.0% 3/10 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.2 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 30, 2016 11/966,281 Affirmed §103
Sep. 18, 2015 12/206,242 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 11, 2015 11/610,473 Reversed N/A
Mar. 13, 2015 11/831,541 Affirmed §103
Jan. 28, 2015 12/044,169 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 23, 2014 11/533,683 Affirmed N/A
Oct. 6, 2014 11/239,954 Affirmed in part §102 · §103
Mar. 7, 2014 11/609,962 Affirmed in part §103
Jun. 28, 2013 11/609,969 Affirmed §101 · §103
Nov. 15, 2012 10/286,013 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 30, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.