Examiner Phuc Tran

Grant ratio: 83.2% (55th percentile in Art Unit 2471 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.89. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 83.2%
Average office actions / grant 1.89
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
78175
Primary art unit
2471
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
1,102
Granted applications
917
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3172
Supervisor
Sujoy K. Kundu
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-8586

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 76.1% 1.65
Group 204 62.6% 1.93
Tech Center 1,763 57.8% 2.14
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.87 2,060 office actions across 1,102 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,101 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 580 52.6%
2 OAs 285 25.9%
3 OAs 129 11.7%
4 OAs 62 5.6%
5+ OAs 45 4.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 86.5% 2008 2009: 85.9% 2009 2010: 89.1% 2010 2011: 90.5% 2011 2012: 82.2% 2012 2013: 94.6% 2013 2014: 95.1% 2014 2015: 90.7% 2015 2016: 89.8% 2016 2017: 89.1% 2017 2018: 89.7% 2018 2019: 96.9% 2019 2020: 95.5% 2020 2021: 93.3% 2021 2022: 93.3% 2022 2023: 91.7% 2023 2024: 95.9% 2024 2025: 48.3% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008373286.5%
2009645585.9%
2010554989.1%
2011635790.5%
2012453782.2%
2013565394.6%
2014413995.1%
2015433990.7%
2016595389.8%
2017554989.1%
2018686189.7%
2019656396.9%
2020676495.5%
2021605693.3%
2022605693.3%
2023605591.7%
2024737095.9%
2025602948.3%
20267100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,101 2.1% 28.7% 39.6% 15.3%
Action 2 521 1.2% 22.6% 60.8% 8.4%
Action 3 236 0.4% 15.3% 71.6% 7.2%
Action 4 107 0.0% 17.8% 70.1% 7.5%
Action 5 45 2.2% 13.3% 77.8% 2.2%
Action 6 25 0.0% 12.0% 76.0% 4.0%
Action 7 11 0.0% 9.1% 90.9% 0.0%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.3% 1 of 304 office actions
All years 1.5% 31 of 2,060 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

1.0%
3.0%
2.2%
2.2%
0.9%
0.9%
2014: Alice
3.6%
0.0%
0.0%
4.5%
4.5%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.1%
1.0%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 1. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 0 reversed.

Full reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
0.0% 0/1 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.6 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 10, 2015 11/875,567 Affirmed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.