Examiner Albert T. Chou

Grant ratio: 85.0% (64th percentile in Art Unit 2471 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.69. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: December 2019
Grant ratio 85.0%
Average office actions / grant 1.69
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
80699
Primary art unit
2471
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
620
Granted applications
527

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 23 76.1% 1.65
Group 204 62.6% 1.93
Tech Center 1,763 57.8% 2.14
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.76 1,097 office actions across 625 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 625 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 346 55.4%
2 OAs 172 27.5%
3 OAs 54 8.6%
4 OAs 38 6.1%
5+ OAs 15 2.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 73.5% 2008 2009: 79.7% 2009 2010: 87.9% 2010 2011: 86.0% 2011 2012: 76.6% 2012 2013: 90.1% 2013 2014: 89.3% 2014 2015: 90.3% 2015 2016: 87.2% 2016 2017: 78.8% 2017 2018: 82.4% 2018 2019: 93.8% 2019

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008342573.5%
2009645179.7%
2010665887.9%
2011574986.0%
2012644976.6%
2013716490.1%
2014565089.3%
2015625690.3%
2016474187.2%
2017332678.8%
2018342882.4%
2019323093.8%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 625 5.6% 11.4% 65.1% 5.8%
Action 2 279 9.7% 9.7% 55.2% 20.4%
Action 3 107 1.9% 4.7% 72.9% 15.9%
Action 4 53 0.0% 3.8% 73.6% 20.8%
Action 5 15 0.0% 13.3% 60.0% 20.0%
Action 6 9 0.0% 11.1% 55.6% 33.3%
Action 7 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 5.8% 64 of 1,097 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
3.2%
7.2%
5.9%
2.9%
6.3%
9.3%
2014: Alice
4.4%
8.0%
8.2%
0.0%
8.6%
2019: PEG
4.3%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 6 reversed.

Full reversal rate
46.2% 6/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
53.8% 7/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
26.4 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 27, 2019 13/817,221 Reversed §103
Jun. 9, 2017 13/586,306 Reversed §101 · §102 · §103 · §112
Apr. 13, 2017 13/735,930 Affirmed §102 · §112
Jun. 8, 2016 13/088,055 Affirmed in part N/A
Apr. 28, 2016 12/714,153 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 22, 2015 13/407,653 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 22, 2015 12/910,359 Affirmed N/A
Jun. 2, 2015 12/169,189 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 19, 2014 12/195,634 Affirmed N/A
May. 13, 2014 12/423,600 Reversed N/A
Oct. 31, 2013 11/412,147 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 13, 2013 11/864,336 Affirmed §102 · §103 · §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.