Examiner Andrew Lee

Grant ratio: 85.9% (82nd percentile in Art Unit 2472 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.40. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 85.9%
Average office actions / grant 1.40
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
74535
Primary art unit
2472
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
1,417
Granted applications
1,217
Examiner phone
(571) 272-3130
Supervisor
Kassim Khalad
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-3770

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 59.9% 1.72
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.44 2,038 office actions across 1,417 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,415 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 2 0.1%
1 OA 999 70.5%
2 OAs 288 20.3%
3 OAs 78 5.5%
4 OAs 32 2.3%
5+ OAs 18 1.3%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 88.9% 2008 2009: 87.7% 2009 2010: 85.0% 2010 2011: 88.3% 2011 2012: 97.5% 2012 2013: 95.7% 2013 2014: 93.1% 2014 2015: 92.4% 2015 2016: 93.2% 2016 2017: 89.7% 2017 2018: 94.5% 2018 2019: 96.4% 2019 2020: 95.0% 2020 2021: 86.1% 2021 2022: 91.6% 2022 2023: 95.1% 2023 2024: 91.1% 2024 2025: 51.4% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008635688.9%
2009575087.7%
2010806885.0%
2011605388.3%
2012817997.5%
2013706795.7%
2014726793.1%
2015797392.4%
2016736893.2%
2017787089.7%
2018918694.5%
2019838096.4%
2020807695.0%
2021726286.1%
2022837691.6%
2023817795.1%
2024797291.1%
2025723751.4%
20266300.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,415 3.5% 11.4% 54.3% 10.9%
Action 2 416 3.1% 6.5% 55.5% 7.5%
Action 3 128 3.1% 10.2% 66.4% 3.9%
Action 4 50 0.0% 16.0% 52.0% 10.0%
Action 5 18 0.0% 5.6% 61.1% 16.7%
Action 6 8 0.0% 12.5% 50.0% 0.0%
Action 7 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.7% 6 of 356 office actions
All years 3.2% 66 of 2,038 office actions
Change -1.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
1.7%
8.6%
3.3%
2.2%
2.7%
8.0%
2014: Alice
8.2%
3.0%
3.8%
2.7%
8.0%
2019: PEG
1.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.8%
1.0%
2024: AI examples
3.7%
2025: August memo
1.5%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
30.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Mar. 31, 2021 15/420,052 Affirmed §103 · §120
Dec. 19, 2016 13/390,393 Affirmed in part §103
Nov. 25, 2013 11/564,294 Affirmed §112
Nov. 22, 2013 11/564,293 Affirmed N/A
Nov. 22, 2013 11/564,303 Affirmed §103 · §112
Feb. 5, 2013 11/359,645 Reversed §103
Jan. 29, 2013 11/564,298 Affirmed §103
Dec. 26, 2012 11/564,296 Affirmed §112

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.