AI Patent Analysis Toolkit
PatentAgility
by KellDann

Examiner Tejis Daya

Examiner Tejis Daya appears to be very easy relative to their art unit, group, tech center, and USPTO peers. Their lifetime grant ratio is 79.0%, they average 1.81 office actions per granted patent, and their rejection profile is dominated by ยง103.

Difficulty vs AU About Average
Difficulty vs Group Very Easy
Difficulty vs TC Very Easy
Difficulty vs USPTO Very Easy
Average OA / Grant 1.81
Export
Word PDF

Create account to export.

Examiner Details

Observed Examiner Years
15 years (2012-2026)
Phone
(571) 270-7817
Predicted Supervisor
Nicholas Jensen
Supervisor Phone
(571) 270-5443
Tech Center
2400 - Computer Networks, Multiplex, Cable and Cryptography/Security
Group
2470 - Multiplex and VoIP

Metrics

Applications Evaluated
594
Granted Applications
469
Non-Granted Applications
125
Avg OA / Grant
1.81
Last OA Observed
March 2026 (2 months ago)
Art Units Seen
2472
Work Groups Seen

Context Comparison

Scope Examiners Lifetime Grant Ratio Avg OA / Grant
This Examiner 1 79.0% 1.81
Art Unit 30 63.1% 1.72
Group 203 65.0% 1.93
Tech Center 1,727 60.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,116 54.8% 1.98

Grant Timeline

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Shaded region marks the last two observed years, where grant outcomes may lag due to recency.
Year Applications Granted Grant Rate
No observed data before 2012; examiner may not yet have been active in the available dataset.
2012 8 7 87.5%
2013 43 34 79.1%
2014 41 36 87.8%
2015 43 33 76.7%
2016 42 31 73.8%
2017 55 46 83.6%
2018 44 38 86.4%
2019 50 41 82.0%
2020 44 36 81.8%
2021 37 33 89.2%
2022 40 36 90.0%
2023 43 40 93.0%
2024 45 41 91.1%
2025 43 17 39.5%
2026 16 0 0.0%

469 family-cache-validated grants; 0 OA-only grant signals.

Rejection Timeline

OA # Office Actions § 101 Percentage § 102 Percentage § 103 Percentage § 112 Percentage
1 587 1.5% 1.4% 85.7% 7.5%
2 259 0.8% 0.4% 88.8% 7.3%
3 109 1.8% 1.8% 85.3% 9.2%
4 58 0.0% 0.0% 94.8% 5.2%
5 31 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
6 20 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 5.0%
7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

§ 101 Yearly Trend

2014: Alice
2019: PEG
2024: AI Examples
2025: Aug. Memo
0.0%
2010
0.0%
2012
0.0%
2013
0.0%
2014
2.4%
2015
1.1%
2016
2.2%
2017
3.2%
2018
2.2%
2019
0.0%
2020
0.0%
2021
0.0%
2022
0.0%
2023
1.5%
2024
3.2%
2025
0.0%
2026

Each bar shows the share of this examiner's observed office actions in that year that included a § 101 rejection.