Examiner Tejis Daya

Grant ratio: 76.8% (62nd percentile in Art Unit 2472 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 1.81. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 76.8%
Average office actions / grant 1.81
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very easy
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO Very easy

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88904
Primary art unit
2472
Work group
2470
Technology center
2400
Applications
611
Granted applications
469
Examiner phone
(571) 270-7817
Supervisor
Nicholas Jensen
Supervisor phone
(571) 270-5443

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 31 59.9% 1.72
Group 202 63.7% 1.93
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 1.84 1,124 office actions across 611 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 604 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 7 1.1%
1 OA 337 55.2%
2 OAs 156 25.5%
3 OAs 53 8.7%
4 OAs 25 4.1%
5+ OAs 33 5.4%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 87.5% 2012 2013: 79.1% 2013 2014: 87.8% 2014 2015: 76.7% 2015 2016: 73.8% 2016 2017: 83.6% 2017 2018: 86.4% 2018 2019: 82.0% 2019 2020: 81.8% 2020 2021: 89.2% 2021 2022: 90.0% 2022 2023: 93.0% 2023 2024: 91.1% 2024 2025: 47.2% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20128787.5%
2013433479.1%
2014413687.8%
2015433376.7%
2016423173.8%
2017554683.6%
2018443886.4%
2019504182.0%
2020443681.8%
2021373389.2%
2022403690.0%
2023434093.0%
2024454191.1%
2025361747.2%
20264000.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 604 1.5% 1.8% 85.8% 7.5%
Action 2 267 0.7% 0.4% 88.8% 7.5%
Action 3 111 1.8% 1.8% 85.6% 9.0%
Action 4 58 0.0% 0.0% 94.8% 5.2%
Action 5 33 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 21 0.0% 0.0% 90.5% 4.8%
Action 7 12 0.0% 0.0% 91.7% 8.3%
Action 8 7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 5 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 1.6% 3 of 193 office actions
All years 1.2% 13 of 1,124 office actions
Change +0.4 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
2.4%
1.1%
2.2%
3.2%
2019: PEG
2.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
1.5%
2025: August memo
3.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 3. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
33.3% 1/3 decisions
Median appeal duration
15.9 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Apr. 19, 2024 15/062,122 Affirmed §103
Sep. 22, 2022 15/695,766 Affirmed §103
Dec. 21, 2016 13/119,988 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.