Examiner Hee-Yong Kim

Grant ratio: 74.4% (92nd percentile in Art Unit 2482 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.08. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: October 2020
Grant ratio 74.4%
Average office actions / grant 2.08
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
86910
Primary art unit
2482
Work group
2480
Technology center
2400
Applications
531
Granted applications
395

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 20 60.2% 2.06
Group 173 59.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.01 1,081 office actions across 538 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 538 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 252 46.8%
2 OAs 160 29.7%
3 OAs 59 11.0%
4 OAs 34 6.3%
5+ OAs 33 6.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2009: 5.9% 2009 2010: 26.7% 2010 2011: 72.2% 2011 2012: 69.7% 2012 2013: 80.0% 2013 2014: 87.0% 2014 2015: 94.7% 2015 2016: 78.0% 2016 2017: 73.9% 2017 2018: 78.7% 2018 2019: 84.8% 2019 2020: 96.3% 2020

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20091715.9%
2010451226.7%
2011543972.2%
2012332369.7%
2013554480.0%
2014544787.0%
2015575494.7%
2016503978.0%
2017463473.9%
2018473778.7%
2019463984.8%
2020272696.3%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 538 3.3% 7.4% 68.2% 4.6%
Action 2 286 2.4% 2.8% 73.8% 4.9%
Action 3 126 1.6% 1.6% 81.0% 4.8%
Action 4 67 1.5% 0.0% 76.1% 9.0%
Action 5 33 0.0% 0.0% 75.8% 12.1%
Action 6 16 6.3% 6.3% 68.8% 0.0%
Action 7 10 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 10.0%
Action 8 3 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 2.7% 29 of 1,081 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
3.3%
1.8%
1.0%
1.1%
2014: Alice
2.2%
9.9%
0.8%
3.0%
1.1%
2019: PEG
4.6%
5.1%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 13. Merits outcomes: 5 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
61.5% 8/13 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
61.5% 8/13 decisions
Median appeal duration
28.0 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jul. 1, 2022 15/709,591 Reversed §103
May. 25, 2017 13/787,559 Reversed §103
Aug. 12, 2016 13/503,295 Reversed §103
Jun. 9, 2016 11/527,305 Reversed §102 · §103
Mar. 23, 2016 12/497,020 Affirmed §103
Nov. 10, 2015 11/527,304 Reversed N/A
Oct. 5, 2015 10/574,023 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 11, 2015 10/586,235 Reversed N/A
Feb. 23, 2015 11/178,177 Reversed N/A
Dec. 16, 2014 11/178,181 Affirmed N/A
Jul. 24, 2014 10/892,897 Affirmed §103
Mar. 24, 2014 10/587,111 Reversed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.