Examiner Mishawn Dunn

Grant ratio: 73.1% (84th percentile in Art Unit 2484 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.10. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: October 2026
Grant ratio 73.1%
Average office actions / grant 2.10
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
81744
Primary art unit
2484
Work group
2480
Technology center
2400
Applications
1,025
Granted applications
749
Examiner phone
(571) 272-7635
Supervisor
Thai Tran
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7382

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 16 61.9% 2.09
Group 174 59.1% 2.00
Tech Center 1,763 57.8% 2.14
USPTO 16,572 52.1% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.04 2,091 office actions across 1,025 applications
Applications with office actions 99.9% 1,024 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.1%
1 OA 530 51.7%
2 OAs 247 24.1%
3 OAs 95 9.3%
4 OAs 71 6.9%
5+ OAs 81 7.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 60.0% 2008 2009: 67.2% 2009 2010: 57.4% 2010 2011: 72.0% 2011 2012: 56.8% 2012 2013: 77.4% 2013 2014: 63.3% 2014 2015: 73.3% 2015 2016: 71.9% 2016 2017: 82.5% 2017 2018: 83.6% 2018 2019: 84.3% 2019 2020: 96.7% 2020 2021: 89.1% 2021 2022: 97.7% 2022 2023: 86.3% 2023 2024: 91.9% 2024 2025: 40.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008503060.0%
2009674567.2%
2010472757.4%
2011503672.0%
2012442556.8%
2013534177.4%
2014493163.3%
2015453373.3%
2016644671.9%
2017635282.5%
2018675683.6%
2019705984.3%
2020605896.7%
2021554989.1%
2022444397.7%
2023514486.3%
2024625791.9%
2025421740.5%
20264200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 1,024 5.5% 21.9% 67.8% 2.7%
Action 2 494 2.0% 13.6% 80.2% 3.2%
Action 3 247 2.0% 8.1% 87.9% 0.8%
Action 4 152 0.7% 4.6% 93.4% 1.3%
Action 5 81 0.0% 7.4% 90.1% 1.2%
Action 6 50 0.0% 4.0% 92.0% 2.0%
Action 7 25 0.0% 8.0% 88.0% 4.0%
Action 8 11 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 12.6% 26 of 206 office actions
All years 3.4% 72 of 2,091 office actions
Change +9.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-10-02–2026-10-02. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

5.9%
1.3%
2.2%
0.7%
1.4%
0.8%
2014: Alice
0.0%
1.9%
0.0%
3.1%
2.6%
2019: PEG
3.9%
6.5%
5.3%
3.2%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
13.1%
2025: August memo
15.8%
12.8%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 2. Merits outcomes: 1 affirmed, 0 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
50.0% 1/2 decisions
Median appeal duration
29.5 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Jun. 22, 2015 11/488,316 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 28, 2012 11/244,681 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Oct. 9, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.