Examiner Tat Chi Chio

Grant ratio: 65.6% (50th percentile in Art Unit 2486 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.15. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 65.6%
Average office actions / grant 2.15
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
82825
Primary art unit
2486
Work group
2480
Technology center
2400
Applications
901
Granted applications
591
Examiner phone
(571) 272-9563
Supervisor
Jamie J Atala
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7384

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 59.9% 2.03
Group 173 59.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.25 2,026 office actions across 901 applications
Applications with office actions 98.9% 891 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 10 1.1%
1 OA 378 42.0%
2 OAs 241 26.7%
3 OAs 108 12.0%
4 OAs 84 9.3%
5+ OAs 80 8.9%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2008: 58.6% 2008 2009: 44.9% 2009 2010: 27.3% 2010 2011: 50.0% 2011 2012: 67.3% 2012 2013: 63.0% 2013 2014: 61.2% 2014 2015: 77.8% 2015 2016: 86.5% 2016 2017: 93.6% 2017 2018: 75.6% 2018 2019: 75.0% 2019 2020: 82.8% 2020 2021: 80.0% 2021 2022: 88.0% 2022 2023: 87.2% 2023 2024: 92.5% 2024 2025: 35.8% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
2008291758.6%
2009492244.9%
201033927.3%
2011402050.0%
2012553767.3%
2013462963.0%
2014493061.2%
2015453577.8%
2016524586.5%
2017474493.6%
2018453475.6%
2019523975.0%
2020584882.8%
2021453680.0%
2022504488.0%
2023474187.2%
2024403792.5%
2025672435.8%
20265200.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 891 2.5% 11.8% 75.9% 1.2%
Action 2 513 1.6% 8.4% 84.0% 1.4%
Action 3 272 1.5% 8.8% 86.8% 1.1%
Action 4 164 0.6% 5.5% 89.6% 0.0%
Action 5 80 2.5% 2.5% 93.8% 0.0%
Action 6 46 0.0% 4.3% 91.3% 2.2%
Action 7 26 0.0% 3.8% 96.2% 0.0%
Action 8 13 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 10 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 6 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.6% 2 of 329 office actions
All years 1.8% 37 of 2,026 office actions
Change -1.2 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.8%
2.5%
2.6%
6.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
1.9%
1.4%
5.1%
3.0%
2.5%
2019: PEG
1.8%
0.0%
1.0%
2.7%
1.8%
2024: AI examples
1.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 20. Merits outcomes: 9 affirmed, 4 affirmed in part, and 7 reversed.

Full reversal rate
35.0% 7/20 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
55.0% 11/20 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.1 months
New grounds of rejection
1
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Aug. 12, 2026 17/391,315 Affirmed §103
Jan. 23, 2023 15/622,678 Affirmed §103 · §112
May. 12, 2022 15/394,176 Affirmed §103 · §112
Apr. 29, 2022 16/256,057 Affirmed in part §103
Apr. 14, 2022 16/042,301 Affirmed N/A
Mar. 14, 2022 15/671,502 Reversed §103
Feb. 6, 2020 15/463,387 Reversed §101
Jan. 19, 2018 14/609,324 Reversed §102 · §103
Jun. 19, 2017 13/904,511 Reversed §103
Sep. 19, 2016 13/007,792 Reversed §102 · §103
Aug. 25, 2016 13/235,099 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103
Jul. 21, 2016 11/499,315 Affirmed in part §103 · §120

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.