Examiner Obafemi Sosanya

Grant ratio: 68.7% (64th percentile in Art Unit 2486 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.02. Most common rejection type: §103.

Appears inactive Last office action in data: May 2021
Grant ratio 68.7%
Average office actions / grant 2.02
Compared with Art unit Very easy
Compared with Work group About average
Compared with Technology center Very easy
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
88059
Primary art unit
2486
Work group
2480
Technology center
2400
Applications
444
Granted applications
305

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 25 59.9% 2.03
Group 173 59.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.12 952 office actions across 450 applications
Applications with office actions 100.0% 450 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 0 0.0%
1 OA 219 48.7%
2 OAs 114 25.3%
3 OAs 49 10.9%
4 OAs 27 6.0%
5+ OAs 41 9.1%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2011: 0.0% 2011 2012: 29.6% 2012 2013: 37.8% 2013 2014: 41.9% 2014 2015: 56.4% 2015 2016: 76.7% 2016 2017: 81.7% 2017 2018: 87.9% 2018 2019: 92.9% 2019 2020: 85.1% 2020 2021: 100.0% 2021

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20111000.0%
201227829.6%
2013371437.8%
2014431841.9%
2015392256.4%
2016735676.7%
2017604981.7%
2018585187.9%
2019423992.9%
2020474085.1%
202188100.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 450 1.3% 12.4% 82.4% 0.4%
Action 2 231 0.4% 6.5% 90.0% 0.4%
Action 3 117 0.0% 3.4% 96.6% 0.0%
Action 4 68 0.0% 1.5% 98.5% 0.0%
Action 5 41 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 6 27 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 7 14 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years N/A 0 of 0 office actions
All years 0.7% 7 of 952 office actions
Change N/A Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2014: Alice
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
3.2%
0.0%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 11. Merits outcomes: 2 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 8 reversed.

Full reversal rate
72.7% 8/11 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
81.8% 9/11 decisions
Median appeal duration
17.7 months
New grounds of rejection
0
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
May. 19, 2020 14/743,662 Reversed §102 · §103
Sep. 16, 2019 14/227,322 Reversed §102 · §103
Dec. 4, 2018 13/770,870 Affirmed N/A
Dec. 7, 2017 13/817,456 Reversed §102 · §103
Jul. 31, 2017 12/556,380 Affirmed in part §103
Sep. 8, 2016 12/379,055 Reversed §103
Jul. 11, 2016 12/766,384 Affirmed §103
Jun. 24, 2016 12/753,356 Reversed §103
May. 18, 2016 12/388,065 Reversed §103
Apr. 29, 2016 12/627,737 Reversed §103
Oct. 30, 2015 12/336,382 Reversed N/A

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.