Examiner Shanika M Brumfield

Grant ratio: 57.5% (9th percentile in Art Unit 2487 among examiners with at least 20 applications). Average office actions per grant: 2.05. Most common rejection type: §103.

Recently active Last office action in data: August 2026
Grant ratio 57.5%
Average office actions / grant 2.05
Compared with Art unit About average
Compared with Work group Very hard
Compared with Technology center About average
Compared with USPTO About average

Examiner record

Examiner ID
89353
Primary art unit
2487
Work group
2480
Technology center
2400
Applications
424
Granted applications
244
Examiner phone
(571) 270-3700
Supervisor
David Czekaj
Supervisor phone
(571) 272-7327

Save this analysis

Download this examiner report.

Log in / Sign Up to export

Peer comparisons

GroupExaminersAverage grant ratioAverage office actions / grant
Art Unit 17 68.7% 2.12
Group 173 59.9% 2.01
Tech Center 1,754 58.4% 2.14
USPTO 16,475 52.7% 1.98

Office actions per application

Average office actions per application 2.25 953 office actions across 424 applications
Applications with office actions 99.8% 423 applications
Office actionsApplicationsShare of applications
No OA observed 1 0.2%
1 OA 175 41.3%
2 OAs 114 26.9%
3 OAs 60 14.2%
4 OAs 40 9.4%
5+ OAs 34 8.0%

Each application is counted once. “5+” includes all higher counts.

Grant history

0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 2012: 33.3% 2012 2013: 41.7% 2013 2014: 55.2% 2014 2015: 39.3% 2015 2016: 55.6% 2016 2017: 60.9% 2017 2018: 67.7% 2018 2019: 61.3% 2019 2020: 66.7% 2020 2021: 80.0% 2021 2022: 90.0% 2022 2023: 89.7% 2023 2024: 80.0% 2024 2025: 39.5% 2025 2026: 0.0% 2026

Recent ratios may be lower while applications remain pending.

Yearly counts
YearApplicationsGrantsGrant rate
20123133.3%
2013241041.7%
2014291655.2%
2015281139.3%
2016271555.6%
2017231460.9%
2018312167.7%
2019311961.3%
2020302066.7%
2021302480.0%
2022201890.0%
2023292689.7%
2024403280.0%
2025431739.5%
20263600.0%

Rejections by office-action stage

Office-action stageActions observed§101§102§103§112
Action 1 423 1.9% 12.3% 74.9% 0.9%
Action 2 248 0.4% 6.9% 91.1% 0.0%
Action 3 134 0.0% 5.2% 93.3% 0.0%
Action 4 74 0.0% 2.7% 95.9% 1.4%
Action 5 34 2.9% 2.9% 94.1% 0.0%
Action 6 25 0.0% 8.0% 92.0% 0.0%
Action 7 8 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 8 4 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 9 2 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Action 10 1 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Section 101 rejections

Last 3 years 0.4% 1 of 234 office actions
All years 1.0% 10 of 953 office actions
Change -0.6 pts Percentage points

Last 3 years: 2023-08-28–2026-08-28. All years includes every dated office action in the data.

By year

22.2%
1.2%
2014: Alice
1.3%
1.7%
1.5%
2.6%
0.0%
2019: PEG
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2024: AI examples
0.0%
2025: August memo
0.0%
2.7%

Each bar is the percentage of office actions with a §101 rejection.

PTAB appeals

Matched decisions: 8. Merits outcomes: 6 affirmed, 1 affirmed in part, and 1 reversed.

Full reversal rate
12.5% 1/8 decisions
Full or partial reversal rate
25.0% 2/8 decisions
Median appeal duration
14.9 months
New grounds of rejection
2
Recent decisions
DecisionApplicationOutcomeIssues
Oct. 9, 2024 17/358,555 Affirmed §103
Jun. 29, 2022 15/076,717 Affirmed New ground of rejection §103
Nov. 15, 2021 15/076,703 Affirmed §103
Jun. 11, 2021 15/246,814 Affirmed §103 · §112
Mar. 30, 2020 14/458,488 Reversed §102 · §103
Jan. 29, 2018 13/164,783 Affirmed in part New ground of rejection §103
Jul. 27, 2017 13/222,540 Affirmed §103
Jun. 2, 2016 12/986,384 Affirmed §103

The examiner match uses the last recorded office action before the decision. Reversal rates exclude rehearings, remands, dismissals, and other decisions that did not reach the merits. Data through Aug. 27, 2026.

Job History

These are temporarily preserved for your convenience, but expire quickly for your security. We never save substantive inputs, pasted text, and/or uploaded files.

Jobs will appear here.